Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 465

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population‐based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer

Open access
Chia, Stephen K., Speers, Caroline H., D'yachkova, Yulia, Kang, Anna, Malfair‐Taylor, Suzanne, Barnett, Jeff, Coldman, Andy, Gelmon, Karen A., O'Reilly, Susan E., Olivotto, Ivo A.·2007·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Over the past decade, a number of new therapeutic agents have become available in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study characterized the use and assessed the impact on survival of population‐based access to new agents for the treatment of MBC. METHODS.: The dates of release in British Columbia of 7 new systemic agents for MBC during the 1990s were used to construct 4 time cohorts. All patients with a first diagnosis of distant metastases in each of the time cohorts were identified and characterized, and their survival was compared. Cox proportional regression modeling was used to assess for predictors of survival. RESULTS.: In total, 2150 patients with a first distant metastases diagnosed during 1 of the 4 cohort intervals were identified. Baseline characteristics between cohorts were similar, except a greater proportion of the later cohorts received adjuvant chemotherapy (P < .001), had positive estrogen receptor status (P = .01), and had a longer median time from initial diagnosis to MBC (P < .001). Survival in Cohort 1 (1991–1992) and Cohort 2 (1994–1995; median, 438 days and 450 days, respectively) was similar. Survival was longer in Cohort 3 (1997–1998; median, 564 days; P = .002) and improved further in Cohort 4 (1999–2001; median, 667 days; P = .05). In multivariate analysis, the later cohorts were associated independently with improved survival (P = .01 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS.: Population‐based access to new therapeutic agents for MBC appeared to be associated with improved survival. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to date that demonstrates, from a population‐based perspective, improving survival over the past decade for women with MBC. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.22867

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 465

Metadata

Authors
Chia, S. K., Speers, C. H., D'yachkova, Y., Kang, A., Malfair‐Taylor, S., Barnett, J., Coldman, A., Gelmon, K. A., O'Reilly, S. E., & Olivotto, I. A.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-20
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
973-979
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2165819904
Cited by
465
References
2
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population‐based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.22867
The paper
Chia, S. K., Speers, C. H., D'yachkova, Y., Kang, A., Malfair‐Taylor, S., Barnett, J., Coldman, A., Gelmon, K. A., O'Reilly, S. E., & Olivotto, I. A. (2007). The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population‐based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22867

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.