Cited by 1,094Cancer Treatment and PharmacologyBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): A phase 3 open-label randomised study

Cortes, Javier, O'Shaughnessy, Joyce, Loesch, David, Blum, Joanne L, Vahdat, Linda T, Petrakova, Katarina, Chollet, Philippe, Manikas, Alexey +12 more·2011·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Treatments with survival benefit are greatly needed for women with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Eribulin mesilate is a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor with a novel mode of action. We aimed to compare overall survival of heavily pretreated patients receiving eribulin versus currently available treatments.Methods In this phase 3 open-label study, women with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were randomly allocated (2:1) to eribulin mesilate (1·4 mg/m(2) administered intravenously during 2-5 min on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) or treatment of physician's choice (TPC). Patients had received between two and five previous chemotherapy regimens (two or more for advanced disease), including an anthracycline and a taxane, unless contraindicated. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, previous capecitabine treatment, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00388726.Findings 762 women were randomly allocated to treatment groups (508 eribulin, 254 TPC). Overall survival was significantly improved in women assigned to eribulin (median 13·1 months, 95% CI 11·8-14·3) compared with TPC (10·6 months, 9·3-12·5; hazard ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·66-0·99; p=0·041). The most common adverse events in both groups were asthenia or fatigue (270 [54%] of 503 patients on eribulin and 98 [40%] of 247 patients on TPC at all grades) and neutropenia (260 [52%] patients receiving eribulin and 73 [30%] of those on TPC at all grades). Peripheral neuropathy was the most common adverse event leading to discontinuation from eribulin, occurring in 24 (5%) of 503 patients.Interpretation Eribulin showed a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival compared with TPC in women with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. This finding challenges the notion that improved overall survival is an unrealistic expectation during evaluation of new anticancer therapies in the refractory setting.Funding Eisai.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60070-6

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eribulin, a truncated synthetic version of halichondrin B, derived from the sponge Halichondria okadai, has clinically potential activity against pretreated metastatic breast cancer cells.

    “Eribulin, a truncated synthetic version of halichondrin B, derived from the sponge Halichondria okadai [149], has clinically potential activity against pretreated metastatic breast cancer cells [150,151].”

    From Marine Natural Products: A Source of Novel Anticancer Drugs (2019) · cites this paper as [151]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cortes, J., O'Shaughnessy, J., Loesch, D., Blum, J. L., Vahdat, L. T., Petrakova, K., Chollet, P., Manikas, A., Diéras, V., Delozier, T., Vladimirov, V., Cardoso, F., Koh, H., Bougnoux, P., Dutcus, C. E., Seegobin, S., Mir, D., Meneses, N., Wanders, J., & Twelves, C.
Affiliations
  • Caris Life Sciences (United States) (US)
  • Texas Oncology (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Centre Jean Perrin (FR)
  • City Clinical Oncology Center (RU)
  • Centre François Baclesse (FR)
  • Pyatigorsk Oncology Center (RU)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Hôpital Bretonneau (FR)
  • Eisai (United States) (US)
  • Eisai (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Twelves, Chris
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
377
Issue
9769
Pages
914-923
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2127152525
Cited by
1,094
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 65
FWCI
34.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eisai
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
metastatic breast cancer, heavily pretreated patients, overall survival, microtubule dynamics inhibitor, peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia
MeSH terms
Polyether Polyketides, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Furans, Humans, Ketones, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Survival Rate, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review