The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pathologic stage is most prognostic of disease‐free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation
Abstract
BACKGROUND.: Preoperative chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, it is uncertain whether pretreatment clinical stage, degree of response to neoadjuvant treatment, or pathologic stage is the most reliable predictor of outcome. This study compared various staging elements and treatment‐related variables to identify which factors or combination of factors reliably prognosticates disease‐free survival in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant combined modality therapy. METHODS.: From a prospectively maintained single institution database, 342 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer staged by endorectal ultrasound were identified. Patients underwent rectal resection 4 to 8 weeks after a 5.5‐week course of pelvic radiotherapy/concurrent chemotherapy. The degree of tumor regression was histologically graded on each resected specimen using a previously reported response scale of 0% to 100%. Predictive models of disease‐free survival were created utilizing available pretherapy and postoperative staging elements in addition to the degree of tumor regression noted histologically. Model accuracy was measured and compared by concordance index, with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS.: Stratifying patients by degree of tumor regression predicted outcome with a concordance index of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59–0.71), which was significantly better than models using preoperative stage elements (concordance index of 0.54; 95% CI, 0.50–0.58). However, the model found to be most predictive of disease‐free survival stratified patients by final pathologic T classification and N classification elements, with a concordance index of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70–0.80). CONCLUSIONS.: Tumor response to preoperative therapy is a strong predictor of disease‐free survival. However, outcome is most accurately estimated by final pathologic stage, which is influenced by both preoperative stage and response to therapy. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
Sauer, R., Becker, H., Hohenberger, W., Rödel, C., Wittekind, C., Fietkau, R., Martus, P., Tschmelitsch, J., Hager, E., Hess, C. F., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040694 · Cited by 6,050
Improved Survival with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Resectable Rectal Cancer
(1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704033361402 · Cited by 2,517
Bujko, K., Nowacki, M. P., Nasierowska-Guttmejer, A., Michalski, W., Bebenek, M., & Kryj, M. (2006) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5506 · Cited by 1,244
Cited by
Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Cercek, A., Roxburgh, C. S. D., Strombom, P., Smith, J. J., Temple, L. K. F., Nash, G. M., Guillem, J. G., Paty, P. B., Yaeger, R., Stadler, Z. K., et al. (2018) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0071 · Cited by 650
Self-citationKalady, M. F., de Campos-Lobato, L. F., Stocchi, L., Geisler, D. P., Dietz, D., Lavery, I. C., & Fazio, V. W. (2009) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b91e63 · Cited by 386
Trakarnsanga, A., Gönen, M., Shia, J., Nash, G. M., Temple, L. K., Guillem, J. G., Paty, P. B., Goodman, K. A., Wu, A., Gollub, M., et al. (2014) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dju248 · Cited by 262
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Quah, H., Chou, J. F., Gonen, M., Shia, J., Schrag, D., Saltz, L. B., Goodman, K. A., Minsky, B. D., Wong, W. D., & Weiser, M. R.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-06-20
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-64
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2034887943
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathologic stage is most prognostic of disease‐free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.23516
- The paper
- Quah, H., Chou, J. F., Gonen, M., Shia, J., Schrag, D., Saltz, L. B., Goodman, K. A., Minsky, B. D., Wong, W. D., & Weiser, M. R. (2008). Pathologic stage is most prognostic of disease‐free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiation. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.