Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 465

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence of early pseudo‐progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide

Open access
Taal, Walter, Brandsma, Dieta, de Bruin, Hein G., Bromberg, Jacoline E., Swaak‐Kragten, Annemarie T., Sillevis Smitt, Peter A. E., van Es, Corine A., van den Bent, Martin J.·2008·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Radiotherapy (RT) plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) is now the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The occurrence of pseudo‐progression directly after RT is a recognized phenomenon, but to the authors' knowledge its incidence after combined RT/TMZ is unknown. The occurrence of early pseudo‐progression was retrospectively assessed in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with RT/TMZ. METHODS.: The pre‐RT and post‐RT brain scans from patients treated with RT/TMZ for a malignant glioma were reviewed. Scans were made before the start of RT, 4 weeks after the end of RT, and every 3 months thereafter. In addition, information was collected regarding clinical signs and symptoms, dexamethasone dose, histology, and survival. RESULTS.: Eighty‐five patients were identified. In 36 patients (42%) the first follow‐up scan 4 weeks after the end of RT indicated disease progression. Of these 36 patients, 18 (50%) were diagnosed with pseudo‐progression. None of the patients received additional treatment other than TMZ. Six of 18 patients with pseudo‐progression and 12 of the 18 patients with real tumor progression developed new clinical signs and symptoms during RT or in the first 4 weeks thereafter. CONCLUSIONS.: Up to 50% of malignant glioma patients treated with RT/TMZ and progression immediately after RT develop pseudo‐progression. The current study data support the idea to continue TMZ in the case of progressive lesions immediately after RT/TMZ. Surgery should be considered in symptomatic cases. The inclusion of patients with progressive lesions developing directly after chemoradiation in studies regarding recurrent gliomas will lead to an overestimation of the results. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.23562

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 465

Metadata

Authors
Taal, W., Brandsma, D., de Bruin, H. G., Bromberg, J. E., Swaak‐Kragten, A. T., Sillevis Smitt, P. A. E., van Es, C. A., & van den Bent, M. J.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-08
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
405-410
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2092736872
Cited by
465
References
2
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of early pseudo‐progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.23562
The paper
Taal, W., Brandsma, D., de Bruin, H. G., Bromberg, J. E., Swaak‐Kragten, A. T., Sillevis Smitt, P. A. E., van Es, C. A., & van den Bent, M. J. (2008). Incidence of early pseudo‐progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23562

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.