Cited by 162Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMRI in cancer diagnosis

Pseudoprogression of glioblastoma after chemo- and radiation therapy: diagnosis by using dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with ferumoxytol versus gadoteridol and correlation with survival

Open access
Gahramanov, Seymur, Muldoon, Leslie L., Varallyay, Csanad G., Li, Xin, Kraemer, Dale F., Fu, Rongwei, Hamilton, Bronwyn E., Rooney, William D. +1 more·2013·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare gadoteridol and ferumoxytol for measurement of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who showed progressive disease at conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after chemo- and radiation therapy (hereafter, chemoradiotherapy) and to correlate rCBV with survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment in one of four institutional review board-approved protocols. Contrast agent leakage maps and rCBV were derived from perfusion MR imaging with gadoteridol and ferumoxytol in 19 patients with apparently progressive GBM on conventional MR images after chemoradiotherapy. Patients were classified as having high rCBV (>1.75), indicating tumor, and low rCBV (≤ 1.75), indicating pseudoprogression, for each contrast agent separately, and with or without contrast agent leakage correction for imaging with gadoteridol. Statistical analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier survival plots with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: With ferumoxytol, rCBV was low in nine (47%) patients, with median overall survival (mOS) of 591 days, and high rCBV in 10 (53%) patients, with mOS of 163 days. A hazard ratio of 0.098 (P = .004) indicated significantly improved survival. With gadoteridol, rCBV was low in 14 (74%) patients, with mOS of 474 days, and high in five (26%), with mOS of 156 days and a nonsignificant hazard ratio of 0.339 (P = .093). Five patients with mismatched high rCBV with ferumoxytol and low rCBV with gadoteridol had an mOS of 171 days. When leakage correction was applied, rCBV with gadoteridol was significantly associated with survival (hazard ratio, 0.12; P = .003). CONCLUSION: Ferumoxytol as a blood pool agent facilitates differentiation between tumor progression and pseudoprogression, appears to be a good prognostic biomarker, and unlike gadoteridol, does not require contrast agent leakage correction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.12111472

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gahramanov, S., Muldoon, L. L., Varallyay, C. G., Li, X., Kraemer, D. F., Fu, R., Hamilton, B. E., Rooney, W. D., & Neuwelt, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Portland VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Radiology
Published
2013-03
Volume
266
Issue
3
Pages
842-852
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2163203871
Cited by
162
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS044687)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA137488)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS053468, R01NS044687)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB007258)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
Keywords
glioblastoma, pseudoprogression, perfusion MRI, ferumoxytol, gadoteridol, relative cerebral blood volume, blood pool agents, chemoradiotherapy, overall survival, prognostic factors, iron oxide contrast agents, contrast-enhanced MRI, treatment response assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain Neoplasms, Contrast Media, Female, Gadolinium, Heterocyclic Compounds, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Organometallic Compounds, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Survival Rate, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Ferrosoferric Oxide, Chemoradiotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review