The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuroendocrine tumor epidemiology: Contrasting Norway and North America
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND.: The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program has proven to be a significant resource in US neuroendocrine tumor (NET) epidemiology. Norway also holds a robust and detailed cancer registry: the Norwegian Registry of Cancer (NRC). METHODS.: SEER NET data were compared with corresponding NRC data in the time period 1993 to 2004 to determine whether there are differences in NET epidemiology between Norway and the United States. RESULTS.: The SEER and NRC reported 17,312 and 2030 NETs, respectively. The overall Caucasian SEER NET incidence was 4.44, compared with 3.24 in the NRC. In the SEER white subset, bronchopulmonary NETs were the most common (incidence = 1.42; 32% of all NETs), compared with small intestinal NETs in the NRC (0.81; 26%). A marked increase in SEER NET incidence (37%‐40%) was observed in the period 2000 to 2004, compared with 1993 to 1997; an even more pronounced increase (72%) was seen in the NRC. African Americans exhibited a remarkably high overall NET incidence of 6.50; furthermore, among African Americans, rectal NETs were most common (1.65; 27%). Small intestinal NET incidence was ∼30% higher in men compared with women in all populations. The highest 5‐year survival rates were for rectal NETs (74%‐88%) in both databases, whereas prostatic NETs had the worst outcome (0%‐23%). At diagnosis, NETs were localized in 27% to 46% of patients. CONCLUSIONS.: NET incidence in the US Caucasian population and in Norway is similar, but considerably higher (∼50%) among African Americans. NETs have been regarded as indolent tumors; however, the 5‐year survival is only ∼55%. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage In The United States: 2006: (668082007-001)
DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Smith, J. (2007) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e668082007-001 · Cited by 1,636
Cited by
Hallet, J., Law, C. H. L., Cukier, M., Saskin, R., Liu, N., & Singh, S. (2015) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29099 · Cited by 852
ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Jejunum and Ileum
Niederle, B., Pape, U.-F., Costa, F., Gross, D., Kelestimur, F., Knigge, U., Öberg, K., Pavel, M., Perren, A., Toumpanakis, C., et al. (2016) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000443170 · Cited by 474
Niederle, M. B., Hackl, M., Kaserer, K., & Niederle, B. (2010) · Endocrine-Related Cancer · doi:10.1677/erc-10-0152 · Cited by 444
Carcinoid Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Trends in Incidence in England Since 1971
Ellis, L., Shale, M. J., & Coleman, M. P. (2010) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.341 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Hauso, O., Gustafsson, B. I., Kidd, M., Waldum, H. L., Drozdov, I., Chan, A. K. C., & Modlin, I. M.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11-03
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2655-2664
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2062011075
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuroendocrine tumor epidemiology: Contrasting Norway and North America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.23883
- The paper
- Hauso, O., Gustafsson, B. I., Kidd, M., Waldum, H. L., Drozdov, I., Chan, A. K. C., & Modlin, I. M. (2008). Neuroendocrine tumor epidemiology: Contrasting Norway and North America. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.