Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Body mass index and risk of ovarian cancer

Open access
Leitzmann, Michael F., Koebnick, Corinna, Danforth, Kim N., Brinton, Louise A., Moore, Steven C., Hollenbeck, Albert R., Schatzkin, Arthur, Lacey, James V.·2009·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Convincing epidemiologic evidence links excess body mass to increased risks of endometrial and postmenopausal breast cancers, but the relation between body mass index (BMI) and ovarian cancer risk remains inconclusive. Potential similarities regarding a hormonal mechanism in the etiology of female cancers highlight the importance of investigating associations according to menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use. However, to the authors' knowledge, data addressing whether the relation between BMI and ovarian cancer differs by MHT use are very sparse. METHODS: The authors prospectively investigated the association between BMI and ovarian cancer among 94,525 US women who were followed between 1996 through 1997 to December 31, 2003. During 7 years of follow‐up, 303 epithelial ovarian cancer cases were documented. RESULTS: Compared with normal weight women (BMI of 18.5‐24.9 kg/m 2), the multivariate relative risk (MVRR) of ovarian cancer for obese women (BMI of ≥30 kg/m 2) in the cohort as a whole was 1.26 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.94‐1.68). Among women who never used MHT, the MVRR for obese versus normal weight women was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.18‐2.84). In contrast, no relation between BMI and ovarian cancer was apparent among women who ever used MHT (MVRR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.65‐1.43; P interaction = 0.02). Exploratory analyses also suggested a positive association between BMI and ovarian cancer among women without a family history of ovarian cancer (MVRR comparing obese vs normal weight women = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.00‐1.86), but no relation with BMI was apparent among women with a positive family history of ovarian cancer (MVRR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.34‐1.62 [P interaction = .02]). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the current study, the authors suspect that obesity is associated with enhanced ovarian cancer risk through a hormonal mechanism. Cancer 2009. Published 2009 by the American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.24086

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Leitzmann, M. F., Koebnick, C., Danforth, K. N., Brinton, L. A., Moore, S. C., Hollenbeck, A. R., Schatzkin, A., & Lacey, J. V.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-06
Volume
115
Issue
4
Pages
812-822
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2077402071
Cited by
158
References
3
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body mass index and risk of ovarian cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.24086
The paper
Leitzmann, M. F., Koebnick, C., Danforth, K. N., Brinton, L. A., Moore, S. C., Hollenbeck, A. R., Schatzkin, A., & Lacey, J. V. (2009). Body mass index and risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24086

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.