The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ewing sarcoma demonstrates racial disparities in incidence‐related and sex‐related differences in outcome: An analysis of 1631 cases from the SEER database, 1973‐2005
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous reports of Ewing sarcoma cohorts suggested that there is a difference in incidence according to racial origin. However, to the authors' knowledge, this finding has never been tested in a population‐based database, and the impact of race on clinical outcome and the significance of known risk factors stratified to racial groups have not been reported. METHODS: Patients who had Ewing sarcoma diagnosed between 1973 and 2005 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics; incidence; year of diagnosis; tumor location, tumor size, and disease stage at diagnosis; treatment(s); cause of death; and survival were extracted. Kaplan‐Meier, log‐rank, and Cox regressions were used to analyze the significance of prognostic factors. RESULTS: Race‐specific incidence indicated that Caucasians have the highest incidence (0.155), followed by Asians/Pacific Islanders (0.082), and African Americans (0.017). The difference in incidence between Caucasians and African Americans was 9‐fold and significant (P < .001). The incidence of Ewing sarcoma increased over the past 3 decades among Caucasians (P < .05). Survival was not impacted by race. Local disease stage, primary tumor location in the appendicular skeleton, and tumor size ≤8 cm conferred a significant survival benefit. Women demonstrated improved survival among the Caucasian patients (P < .03). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report focusing on racial disparity in incidence of Ewing sarcoma. Caucasians were affected more frequently, although outcomes were similar between races. It is noteworthy that being a woman constituted a survival benefit only among the Caucasian patients. Further studies will need to clarify the reasons for racial disparities in incidence and for sex differences in survival. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grünewald, T. G. P., Cidre-Aranaz, F., Surdez, D., Tomazou, E. M., de Álava, E., Kovar, H., Sorensen, P. H., Delattre, O., & Dirksen, U. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0003-x · Cited by 873
Metadata
- Authors
- Jawad, M. U., Cheung, M. C., Min, E. S., Schneiderbauer, M. M., Koniaris, L. G., & Scully, S. P.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-22
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3526-3536
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2008679675
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ewing sarcoma demonstrates racial disparities in incidence‐related and sex‐related differences in outcome: An analysis of 1631 cases from the SEER database, 1973‐2005. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.24388
- The paper
- Jawad, M. U., Cheung, M. C., Min, E. S., Schneiderbauer, M. M., Koniaris, L. G., & Scully, S. P. (2009). Ewing sarcoma demonstrates racial disparities in incidence‐related and sex‐related differences in outcome: An analysis of 1631 cases from the SEER database, 1973‐2005. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24388
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.