CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 268Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFamily Support in IllnessCancer survivorship and care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychosocial service use and unmet need among recently diagnosed adolescent and young adult cancer patients

Open access
Zebrack, Brad J., Block, Rebecca, Hayes‐Lattin, Brandon, Embry, Leanne, Aguilar, Christine, Meeske, Kathleen A., Li, Yun, Butler, Melissa, Cole, Steven·2013·Cancer
DOI 10.1002/cncr.27713
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer demonstrate biomedical risks and psychosocial issues distinct from those of children or older adults. In this study, the authors examined and compared the extent to which AYAs treated in pediatric or adult oncology settings reported use of, and unmet need for, psychosocial support services. METHODS: Within 4 months of initial cancer diagnosis, 215 AYAs ages 14 to 39 years (99 from pediatric care settings and 116 from adult care settings; 75% response rate) were assessed for reporting use of information resources, emotional support services, and practical support services. Statistical analyses derived odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for service use and unmet needs after controlling for race, employment/school status, sex, relationship status, severity of cancer, treatment, and treatment‐related side effects. RESULTS: AYAs ages 20 to 29 years were significantly less likely than teens and older patients ages 30 to 39 years to report using professional mental health services and were significantly more likely to report an unmet need with regard to cancer information, infertility information, and diet/nutrition information. Compared with teens who were treated in pediatric facilities, AYAs who were treated in adult facilities were more likely to report an unmet need for age‐appropriate Internet sites, professional mental health services, camp/retreats programs, transportation assistance, and complementary and alternative health services. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial proportions of AYAs are not getting their psychosocial care needs met. Bolstering psychosocial support staff and patient referral to community‐based social service agencies and reputable Internet resources may enhance care and improve quality of life for AYAs. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.27713

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.1002/1097-0142(19930515)71:10 <3463::AID-CNCR2820711753>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  2. Palmer S, 2008, A Practice Framework for Working With 15‐25 Year‐Old Cancer Patients Treated Within the Adult Health Sector
  3. National Cancer Institute, 2006, Closing the Gap: Research and Care Imperatives for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer. A Report of the Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Program Review Group
  4. Chesler M, 1987, Childhood Cancer and the Family

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 268

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zebrack, B. J., Block, R., Hayes‐Lattin, B., Embry, L., Aguilar, C., Meeske, K. A., Li, Y., Butler, M., & Cole, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Michigan–Dearborn (US)
  • HopeLab (US)
Corresponding author
Zebrack, Brad J.
ORCID
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-28
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
201-214
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
DOI
10.1002/cncr.27713
OpenAlex
W1595352978
Cited by
268
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hopelab Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Support in Illness
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
adolescent and young adult cancer, psychosocial support, unmet needs, mental health service utilization, cancer information needs, nutrition information, emotional support services
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Neoplasms, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies, Social Support, Adolescent Health Services, Needs Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review