The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns of onset and resolution of immune‐related adverse events of special interest with ipilimumab: Detailed safety analysis from a phase 3 trial in patients with advanced melanoma
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was the first agent to demonstrate improved survival in previously treated patients with metastatic melanoma in a phase 3 trial (MDX010‐20). Ipilimumab produced a characteristic spectrum of immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) of special interest, consistent with its immune‐based mechanism of action. METHODS: In MDX010‐20, 676 previously treated patients were randomized 3:1:1 to receive ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus the glycoprotein 100 melanoma antigen vaccine (gp100), ipilimumab 3 mg/kg + placebo, or gp100 vaccine + placebo. For the current report, the authors conducted a detailed analysis of the time to onset and resolution of irAEs associated with ipilimumab therapy. RESULTS: Grade 2 through 5 irAEs generally developed during the induction phase of treatment (0‐12 weeks). Most, including grade 3/4 irAEs, were reversible when managed with treatment guidelines using vigilant monitoring and corticosteroids. The median time to resolution (to grade 1 or 0 or to the grade at baseline) of irAEs that had an onset during the induction phase was approximately 6 weeks for grade 2 through 4 irAEs and 8 weeks for grade 3 and 4 irAEs. Across the entire study duration, most grade 2 through 4 irAEs resolved within 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Most ipilimumab‐associated irAEs, including grade 3/4 symptoms, developed within 12 weeks of initial dosing and resolved within 12 weeks of onset. IrAEs were well characterized in their evolution and could be managed using published algorithms. Cancer 2013. © 2013 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Hodi, F. S., O'Day, S. J., McDermott, D. F., Weber, R. W., Sosman, J. A., Haanen, J. B., Gonzalez, R., Robert, C., Schadendorf, D., Hassel, J. C., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1003466 · Cited by 15,155
Self-citationManagement of Immune-Related Adverse Events and Kinetics of Response With Ipilimumab
Weber, J. S., Kähler, K. C., & Hauschild, A. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.41.6750 · Cited by 1,415
Self-citationIpilimumab in patients with melanoma and brain metastases: an open-label, phase 2 trial
Margolin, K., Ernstoff, M. S., Hamid, O., Lawrence, D., McDermott, D., Puzanov, I., Wolchok, J. D., Clark, J. I., Sznol, M., Logan, T. F., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70090-6 · Cited by 1,091
Self-citationFRANCHIMONT, D. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1321.009 · Cited by 408
Cited by
Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance
Martins, F., Sofiya, L., Sykiotis, G. P., Lamine, F., Maillard, M., Fraga, M., Shabafrouz, K., Ribi, C., Cairoli, A., Guex-Crosier, Y., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0218-0 · Cited by 2,314
Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint blockade: a comprehensive review
Michot, J. M., Bigenwald, C., Champiat, S., Collins, M., Carbonnel, F., Postel-Vinay, S., Berdelou, A., Varga, A., Bahleda, R., Hollebecque, A., et al. (2016) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.016 · Cited by 2,127
CTLA-4: a moving target in immunotherapy
Rowshanravan, B., Halliday, N., & Sansom, D. M. (2018) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-06-741033 · Cited by 1,233
Dubin, K., Callahan, M. K., Ren, B., Khanin, R., Viale, A., Ling, L., No, D., Gobourne, A., Littmann, E., Huttenhower, C., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10391 · Cited by 987
Gut microbiota modulation of chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity
Alexander, J. L., Wilson, I. D., Teare, J., Marchesi, J. R., Nicholson, J. K., & Kinross, J. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.20 · Cited by 970
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, J. S., Dummer, R., de Pril, V., Lebbé, C., Hodi, F. S., & for the MDX010‐20 Investigators
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-07
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1675-1682
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1556990476
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.