Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by plasma Epstein‐Barr virus DNA analysis in a surveillance program

Open access
Chan, K. C. Allen, Hung, Emily C. W., Woo, John K. S., Chan, Paul K. S., Leung, Sing‐Fai, Lai, Franco P. T., Cheng, Anita S. M., Yeung, Sze Wan, Chan, Yin Wah, Tsui, Teresa K. C., Kwok, Jeffrey S. S., King, Ann D., Chan, Anthony T. C., van Hasselt, Andrew C., Lo, Y. M. Dennis·2013·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is prevalent in Southeast Asia. Over the last decade, plasma Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) DNA has been developed as a tumor marker for NPC. In this study, the authors investigated whether plasma EBV DNA analysis is useful for NPC surveillance. METHODS: In total, 1318 volunteers ages 40 to 60 years were prospectively recruited. Plasma EBV DNA and serology for viral capsid antigen immunoglobulin A (IgA) were measured. Participants who had detectable plasma EBV DNA or positive IgA serology underwent nasal endoscopic examination and a follow‐up plasma EBV DNA analysis in approximately 2 weeks. All participants were followed for 2 years to record the development of NPC. RESULTS: Three individuals with NPC were identified at enrolment. All of them were positive for EBV DNA and remained positive in follow‐up analysis. Only 1 of those patients was positive for EBV serology. In 1 patient who had NPC with a small tumor confined to the mucosa, the tumor was not detectable on endoscopic examination. Because of a 2‐fold increase in plasma EBV DNA on the follow‐up analysis, that patient underwent magnetic resonance imaging, which revealed the tumor. Among the participants who did not have NPC but had initially positive plasma EBV DNA results, approximately 66% had negative EBV DNA results after a median of 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma EBV DNA analysis proved useful for detecting early NPC in individuals without a clinical suspicion of NPC. Repeating the test in those who had initially positive results differentiated those with NPC from those who had false‐positive results. Cancer 2013. © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.28001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Chan, K. C. A., Hung, E. C. W., Woo, J. K. S., Chan, P. K. S., Leung, S., Lai, F. P. T., Cheng, A. S. M., Yeung, S. W., Chan, Y. W., Tsui, T. K. C., Kwok, J. S. S., King, A. D., Chan, A. T. C., van Hasselt, A. C., & Lo, Y. M. D.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-21
Volume
119
Issue
10
Pages
1838-1844
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1528693940
Cited by
163
References
0
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by plasma Epstein‐Barr virus DNA analysis in a surveillance program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.28001
The paper
Chan, K. C. A., Hung, E. C. W., Woo, J. K. S., Chan, P. K. S., Leung, S., Lai, F. P. T., Cheng, A. S. M., Yeung, S. W., Chan, Y. W., Tsui, T. K. C., Kwok, J. S. S., King, A. D., Chan, A. T. C., van Hasselt, A. C., & Lo, Y. M. D. (2013). Early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by plasma Epstein‐Barr virus DNA analysis in a surveillance program. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.