Cited by 2,809Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsBRCA gene mutations in cancer

Liquid biopsies come of age: Towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA

Open access
Wan, Jonathan C. M., Massie, Charles, Garcia-Corbacho, Javier, Mouliere, Florent, Brenton, James D., Caldas, Carlos, Pacey, Simon, Baird, Richard +1 more·2017·Nature Reviews Cancer

Abstract

Improvements in genomic and molecular methods are expanding the range of potential applications for circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), both in a research setting and as a 'liquid biopsy' for cancer management. Proof-of-principle studies have demonstrated the translational potential of ctDNA for prognostication, molecular profiling and monitoring. The field is now in an exciting transitional period in which ctDNA analysis is beginning to be applied clinically, although there is still much to learn about the biology of cell-free DNA. This is an opportune time to appraise potential approaches to ctDNA analysis, and to consider their applications in personalized oncology and in cancer research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrc.2017.7

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wan, J. C. M., Massie, C., Garcia-Corbacho, J., Mouliere, F., Brenton, J. D., Caldas, C., Pacey, S., Baird, R., & Rosenfeld, N.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Rosenfeld, Nitzan
Venue
Nature Reviews Cancer
Published
2017-02-24
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
223-238
ISSN
  • 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1768
OpenAlex
W2590954301
Cited by
2,809
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 373 · 2025: 358 · 2024: 268 · 2023: 308 · 2022: 286 · 2021: 309 · 2020: 311 · 2019: 276 · 2018: 221 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
25.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • Cancer Research UK (22905, A15601, 20240, 15601, A20240, C14303 / A17197, 16942, A11906)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0515-10090, NF-SI-0611-10154)
  • European Commission (2007–2013, FP/2007/2013)
  • Healthway (22905)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica
  • Hutchison Whampoa Limited
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (337905)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
circulating tumor DNA, liquid biopsy, cell-free DNA, molecular profiling, disease surveillance, precision oncology, clinical implementation, cancer research
MeSH terms
Biopsy, DNA, Neoplasm, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Early Detection of Cancer, Precision Medicine, Clonal Evolution, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review