Cited by 67Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal MalignanciesEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of ovarian cancer

Markman, Maurie, Reichman, Bonnie, Hakes, Thomas, Curtin, John, Jones, Walter, Lewis, John L., Barakat, Richard, Rubin, Stephen +4 more·1993·Cancer

Abstract

During the past decade, intraperitoneal therapy of ovarian cancer has evolved from a pharmacologic model into an established treatment technique for women with this malignancy. Approximately 40% of patients with small‐volume residual ovarian cancer (microscopic disease or macroscopic tumor, ≤ 0.5 cm in maximum tumor diameter), after an objective response to initial organoplatinum‐based systemic chemotherapy, may have a surgically documented complete response to platinum‐based intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Patients who have not responded to systemic platinum administration rarely will respond to the drug given intraperitoneally, despite the presence of only small‐volume residual disease when this regional treatment strategy is used. Other agents with antineoplastic activity after intraperitoneal administration in women with ovarian cancer include mitoxantrone, taxol, alpha‐interferon and gamma‐interferon, and interleukin‐2. Although intraperitoneal therapy currently is being examined as a component of the initial chemotherapeutic program for patients with ovarian cancer, a precise role for regional drug delivery in this clinical setting remains to be defined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.2820710423

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Partial systemic restriction of intraperitoneal administration resulted in reduced toxicity and treatment-related complications.

    “Furthermore, the partial systemic restriction of intraperitoneal administration resulted in reduced toxicity and treatment-related complications (44–46).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Markman, M., Reichman, B., Hakes, T., Curtin, J., Jones, W., Lewis, J. L., Barakat, R., Rubin, S., Mychalczak, B., Saigo, P., Almadrones, L., & Hoskins, W.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Markman, Maurie
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-02-15
Volume
71
Issue
S4
Pages
1565-1570
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2103862203
Cited by
67
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA 52477, P01CA052477)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
intraperitoneal chemotherapy, ovarian cancer, residual disease, platinum-based chemotherapy, regional drug delivery, complete response, mitoxantrone, paclitaxel, interferon, interleukin-2, initial chemotherapy
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Cisplatin, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Ovarian Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review