Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A consensus review on malignancy‐associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults

Open access
Daver, Naval, McClain, Kenneth, Allen, Carl E., Parikh, Sameer A., Otrock, Zaher, Rojas‐Hernandez, Cristhiam, Blechacz, Boris, Wang, Sa, Minkov, Milen, Jordan, Michael B., La Rosée, Paul, Kantarjian, Hagop M.·2017·Cancer

Abstract

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a syndrome of severe immune activation and dysregulation resulting in extreme and often life‐threatening inflammation. HLH has been well recognized in pediatric populations, and most current diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines are based on pediatric HLH. Recently there has been recognition of HLH in adults, especially secondary to immune deregulation by an underlying rheumatologic, infectious, or malignant condition. This review is focused on malignancy‐associated HLH (M‐HLH), in which possible mechanisms of pathogenesis include severe inflammation, persistent antigen stimulation by the tumor cells, and loss of immune homeostasis because of chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, or infection. Previously considered rare, M‐HLH may occur in up to 1% of patients with hematologic malignancies. M‐HLH is often missed or diagnosed late in most published studies, and it has been associated with a poor median survival of less than 2 months. Identification of the clinical and laboratory features specific to M‐HLH in adults may allow early detection, consultation with HLH experts, and intervention. Improved management of adult M‐HLH with optimal combinations of T‐lympholytic and immunosuppressive agents and the incorporation of novel agents based on the pediatric experience hopefully will improve outcomes in adults with M‐HLH. Cancer 2017;123:3229‐40. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.30826

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Metadata

Authors
Daver, N., McClain, K., Allen, C. E., Parikh, S. A., Otrock, Z., Rojas‐Hernandez, C., Blechacz, B., Wang, S., Minkov, M., Jordan, M. B., La Rosée, P., & Kantarjian, H. M.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-16
Volume
123
Issue
17
Pages
3229-3240
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2625802019
Cited by
258
References
59
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A consensus review on malignancy‐associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.30826
The paper
Daver, N., McClain, K., Allen, C. E., Parikh, S. A., Otrock, Z., Rojas‐Hernandez, C., Blechacz, B., Wang, S., Minkov, M., Jordan, M. B., La Rosée, P., & Kantarjian, H. M. (2017). A consensus review on malignancy‐associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30826

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.