The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stomach cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001‐2009): Findings from the CONCORD‐2 study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Stomach cancer was a leading cause of cancer‐related deaths early in the 20th century and has steadily declined over the last century in the United States. Although incidence and death rates are now low, stomach cancer remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in black, Asian and Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native populations. METHODS: Data from the CONCORD‐2 study were used to analyze stomach cancer survival among males and females aged 15 to 99 years who were diagnosed in 37 states covering 80% of the US population. Survival analyses were corrected for background mortality using state‐specific and race‐specific (white and black) life tables and age‐standardized using the International Cancer Survival Standard weights. Net survival is presented up to 5 years after diagnosis by race (all, black, and white) for 2001 through 2003 and 2004 through 2009 to account for changes in collecting Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Summary Stage 2000 data from 2004. RESULTS: Almost one‐third of stomach cancers were diagnosed at a distant stage among both whites and blacks. Age‐standardized 5‐year net survival increased between 2001 to 2003 and 2004 to 2009 (26.1% and 29%, respectively), and no differences were observed by race. The 1‐year, 3‐year, and 5‐year survival estimates were 53.1%, 33.8%, and 29%, respectively. Survival improved in most states. Survival by stage was 64% (local), 28.2% (regional), and 5.3% (distant). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate high fatality for stomach cancer, especially soon after diagnosis. Although improvements in stomach cancer survival were observed, survival remained relatively low for both blacks and whites. Primary prevention through the control of well‐established risk factors would be expected to have the greatest impact on further reducing deaths from stomach cancer. Cancer 2017;123:4994‐5013. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-5024 · Cited by 5,350
Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2015-2016.
Hales, C. M., Carroll, M. D., Fryar, C. D., & Ogden, C. L. (2017) · PubMed · Cited by 3,884
Allemani, C., Weir, H. K., Carreira, H., Harewood, R., Spika, D., Wang, X.-S., Bannon, F., Ahn, J. V., Johnson, C. J., Bonaventure, A., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62038-9 · Cited by 2,614
Self-citationLevamisole and Fluorouracil for Adjuvant Therapy of Resected Colon Carcinoma
Moertel, C. G., Fleming, T. R., Macdonald, J. S., Haller, D. G., Laurie, J. A., Goodman, P. J., Ungerleider, J. S., Emerson, W. A., Tormey, D. C., Glick, J. H., et al. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199002083220602 · Cited by 2,256
Gastric Cancer: Descriptive Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Screening, and Prevention
Karimi, P., Islami, F., Anandasabapathy, S., Freedman, N. D., & Kamangar, F. (2014) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-1057 · Cited by 1,879
Caregiving for Older Adults with Obesity in the United States
Ankuda, C. K., Harris, J., Ornstein, K., Levine, D. A., Langa, K. M., & Kelley, A. S. (2017) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.14918 · Cited by 1,684
International Classification of Diseases for Oncology
Trott, P. A. (1977) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.30.8.782-c · Cited by 1,676
Kopetz, S., Chang, G. J., Overman, M. J., Eng, C., Sargent, D. J., Larson, D. W., Grothey, A., Vauthey, J.-N., Nagorney, D. M., & McWilliams, R. R. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.5278 · Cited by 1,339
Edwards, B. K., Noone, A., Mariotto, A. B., Simard, E. P., Boscoe, F. P., Henley, S. J., Jemal, A., Cho, H., Anderson, R. N., Kohler, B. A., et al. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28509 · Cited by 1,210
Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. preventive services Task force recommendation statement
Moyer, V. A., & on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force* (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424 · Cited by 1,049
Cited by
Allemani, C., Harewood, R., Johnson, C. J., Carreira, H., Spika, D., Bonaventure, A., Ward, K., Weir, H. K., & Coleman, M. P. (2017) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.31025 · Cited by 35
Self-citationWeir, H. K., Stewart, S. L., Allemani, C., White, M. C., Thomas, C. C., White, A., Coleman, M. P., & for the CONCORD Working Group (US Members) (2017) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.31028 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jim, M. A., Pinheiro, P. S., Carreira, H., Espey, D. K., Wiggins, C. L., & Weir, H. K.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-12-05
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- S24
- Pages
- 4994-5013
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2774422690
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stomach cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001‐2009): Findings from the CONCORD‐2 study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.30881
- The paper
- Jim, M. A., Pinheiro, P. S., Carreira, H., Espey, D. K., Wiggins, C. L., & Weir, H. K. (2017). Stomach cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001‐2009): Findings from the CONCORD‐2 study. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30881
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.