Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stomach cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001‐2009): Findings from the CONCORD‐2 study

Open access
Jim, Melissa A., Pinheiro, Paulo S., Carreira, Helena, Espey, David K., Wiggins, Charles L., Weir, Hannah K.·2017·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stomach cancer was a leading cause of cancer‐related deaths early in the 20th century and has steadily declined over the last century in the United States. Although incidence and death rates are now low, stomach cancer remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in black, Asian and Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native populations. METHODS: Data from the CONCORD‐2 study were used to analyze stomach cancer survival among males and females aged 15 to 99 years who were diagnosed in 37 states covering 80% of the US population. Survival analyses were corrected for background mortality using state‐specific and race‐specific (white and black) life tables and age‐standardized using the International Cancer Survival Standard weights. Net survival is presented up to 5 years after diagnosis by race (all, black, and white) for 2001 through 2003 and 2004 through 2009 to account for changes in collecting Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Summary Stage 2000 data from 2004. RESULTS: Almost one‐third of stomach cancers were diagnosed at a distant stage among both whites and blacks. Age‐standardized 5‐year net survival increased between 2001 to 2003 and 2004 to 2009 (26.1% and 29%, respectively), and no differences were observed by race. The 1‐year, 3‐year, and 5‐year survival estimates were 53.1%, 33.8%, and 29%, respectively. Survival improved in most states. Survival by stage was 64% (local), 28.2% (regional), and 5.3% (distant). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate high fatality for stomach cancer, especially soon after diagnosis. Although improvements in stomach cancer survival were observed, survival remained relatively low for both blacks and whites. Primary prevention through the control of well‐established risk factors would be expected to have the greatest impact on further reducing deaths from stomach cancer. Cancer 2017;123:4994‐5013. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.30881

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Jim, M. A., Pinheiro, P. S., Carreira, H., Espey, D. K., Wiggins, C. L., & Weir, H. K.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-05
Volume
123
Issue
S24
Pages
4994-5013
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2774422690
Cited by
300
References
79
FWCI
11.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stomach cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001‐2009): Findings from the CONCORD‐2 study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.30881
The paper
Jim, M. A., Pinheiro, P. S., Carreira, H., Espey, D. K., Wiggins, C. L., & Weir, H. K. (2017). Stomach cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001‐2009): Findings from the CONCORD‐2 study. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30881

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.