Cited by 1,049Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Screening for Cervical Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Moyer, Virginia A., on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*·2012·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Description Update of the 2003 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation statement on screening for cervical cancer. Methods The USPSTF reviewed new evidence on the comparative test performance of liquid-based cytology and the benefits and harms of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a stand-alone test or in combination with cytology. In addition to the systematic evidence review, the USPSTF commissioned a decision analysis to help clarify the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, and the relative benefits and harms of different strategies for screening (such as cytology and co-testing). Recommendations This recommendation statement applies to women who have a cervix, regardless of sexual history. This recommendation statement does not apply to women who have received a diagnosis of a high-grade precancerous cervical lesion or cervical cancer, women with in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol, or women who are immunocompromised (such as those who are HIV positive).The USPSTF recommends screening for cervical cancer in women aged 21 to 65 years with cytology (Papanicolaou smear) every 3 years or, for women aged 30 to 65 years who want to lengthen the screening interval, screening with a combination of cytology and HPV testing every 5 years. See the Clinical Considerations for discussion of cytology method, HPV testing, and screening interval (A recommendation).The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cance…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00377 · DOI
  2. 10.7326/0003-4819-148-7-200804010-00004 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181996ffa · DOI
  4. 10.3322/caac.21139 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61248-4 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1136/bmj.39196.740995.BE · DOI
  7. 10.1001/jama.2009.1569 · DOI
  8. 10.1136/bmj.326.7392.733 · DOI
  9. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0137 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600918 · DOI
  11. 10.1056/NEJMoa071430 · DOI
  12. 10.1001/jama.288.14.1749 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602728 · DOI
  14. 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00376 · DOI
  15. 10.1136/bmj.293.6548.659 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.043 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602049 · DOI
  18. 10.7326/0003-4819-117-6-520 · DOI
  19. 10.2105/AJPH.85.6.791 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cdip.2005.12.006 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70360-2 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61450-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1056/NEJMoa073204 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70156-1 · DOI
  25. 10.3310/hta13510 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70296-0 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70145-0 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70601-0 · DOI
  29. 10.1056/NEJM199611213352103 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02263.x · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1136/bmj.a1284 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01113.x · DOI
  34. 10.1093/jnci/djn444 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.056 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603210 · DOI
  37. 10.1128/JCM.00896-09 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604324 · DOI
  39. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c6f8a4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,049

Metadata

Authors
Moyer, V. A., & on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
Affiliations
United States Preventive Services Task Force (US)
Corresponding author
Moyer, Virginia A.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2012-06-19
Volume
156
Issue
12
Pages
880-891
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2132640627
Cited by
1,049
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 110 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 28
FWCI
80.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, HPV testing, Pap smear, liquid-based cytology, screening frequency, hysterectomy, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, diethylstilbestrol exposure, HIV, screening benefits and harms
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Vaginal Smears, Risk Assessment, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer, Papanicolaou Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review