The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of probiotics to reduce the severity of oral mucositis induced by chemoradiotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a probiotic combination on the severity of oral mucositis (OM), which is a common, unpreventable complication induced by radiochemotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who undergo concurrent radiochemotherapy (CCRT). Methods: Eligible patients (n = 99) with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were undergoing CCRT were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive a probiotic combination or placebo during radiochemotherapy, and the incidence of severe OM (grade 3 or higher) was the primary endpoint. Results: Patients taking the probiotic combination showed a significant reduction in the severity of OM. The incidences of grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 OM in the placebo group and the probiotic combination group were 0% and 12.07%, 0% and 55.17%, 54.29% and 17.24%, and 45.71% and 15.52%, respectively. Furthermore, CCRT greatly lowered the number of immune cells, whereas the probiotic combination markedly lowered the reduction rates of CD4 + T cells (76.59% vs 52.85%; P < .05), CD8 + T cells (62.94% vs 29.76%; P < .05), and CD3 + T cells (69.72% vs 45.49%; P < .05) in an A‐CCRT‐P (after treatment with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy plus the probiotic combination) group. High‐throughput sequencing results indicated that CCRT had obviously disturbed the intestinal diversity of patients in an A‐CCRT (after treatment with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy plus a placebo) group, whereas the probiotic combination distinctly restored the microbial diversity in the A‐CCRT‐P group toward that of healthy people and a B‐CCRT‐P (before the treatment of radiotherapy plus chemotherapy plus the probiotic combination) group. Conclusions: A probiotic combination significantly enhances the immune response of patients and reduces the severity of OM through modification of gut microbiota.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Obesity alters gut microbial ecology
Ley, R. E., Bäckhed, F., Turnbaugh, P., Lozupone, C. A., Knight, R. D., & Gordon, J. I. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504978102 · Cited by 6,176
Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients
Gopalakrishnan, V., Spencer, C. N., Nezi, L., Reuben, A., Andrews, M. C., Karpinets, T. V., Prieto, P. A., Vicente, D., Hoffman, K., Wei, S. C., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan4236 · Cited by 4,812
Interactions Between the Microbiota and the Immune System
Hooper, L. V., Littman, D. R., & Macpherson, A. J. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1223490 · Cited by 4,173
Ecological and Evolutionary Forces Shaping Microbial Diversity in the Human Intestine
Ley, R. E., Peterson, D. A., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017 · Cited by 3,358
Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system
Maynard, C. L., Elson, C. O., Hatton, R. D., & Weaver, C. T. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11551 · Cited by 1,598 · cited 1×
“There is evidence that Bacteroidales and Bifidobacterium greatly increase the number and activity of immune cells, which then promote the efficacy of anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4 and anti–programmed death ligand 1 therapy.(9,13) For”
BackgroundDevelopment of immuno-oncology drugs — from CTLA4 to PD1 to the next generations
Hoos, A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2015.35 · Cited by 601
Cited by
Antibiotics for cancer treatment: A double-edged sword
Gao, Y., Shang, Q., Li, W., Guo, W., Stojadinovic, A., Mannion, C., Man, Y.-G., & Chen, T. (2020) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.47470 · Cited by 253
Self-citationThe impact of the gut microbiome on tumor immunotherapy: from mechanism to application strategies
Guo, C., Kong, L., Xiao, L., Liu, K., Cui, H., Xin, Q., Gu, X., Jiang, C., & Wu, J. (2023) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-023-01135-y · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, C., Wang, H., Xia, C., Dong, Q., Chen, E., Qiu, Y., Su, Y., Xie, H., Zeng, L., Kuang, J., Ao, F., Gong, X., Li, J., & Chen, T.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-06
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1081-1090
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2904414943
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of probiotics to reduce the severity of oral mucositis induced by chemoradiotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.31907
- The paper
- Jiang, C., Wang, H., Xia, C., Dong, Q., Chen, E., Qiu, Y., Su, Y., Xie, H., Zeng, L., Kuang, J., Ao, F., Gong, X., Li, J., & Chen, T. (2019). A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of probiotics to reduce the severity of oral mucositis induced by chemoradiotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.