Cited by 12Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Cytopathology of pediatric malignancies: Where are we today with fine‐needle aspiration biopsies in pediatric oncology?

Open access
Monaco, Sara E., Teot, Lisa A.·2014·Cancer Cytopathology

Abstract

Pediatric malignancies are uncommon and many have overlapping morphologic features, which together present diagnostic challenges. Cytopathology is recognized as an accurate and cost‐effective modality for the diagnosis of pediatric malignancies in resource‐limited countries, but is underused for this purpose in the United States. This review focuses on the cytopathology of pediatric malignancies with the goal of demystifying cytologic diagnoses of these entities. Differences between malignancies in young patients and adults are discussed, and key epidemiological features of childhood malignancies are highlighted. In addition, the use of cytopathology in different geographical settings is contrasted to illustrate the impact of variable usage on the incidence of malignancy and the types of tumors observed in cytologic specimens. A review of the pattern‐based approach to differential diagnosis is also incorporated, including the cytomorphologic features and ancillary studies that help to distinguish between various malignancies within each pattern. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2014;122:322–336. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncy.21401

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FNAC is a safe, accurate, prompt and inexpensive procedure for diagnosis of both neoplastic and infectious diseases in adult and pediatric populations.

    “Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has been widely accepted to be a safe, accurate, prompt and inexpensive procedure for diagnosis of both neoplastic and infectious diseases in adult and pediatric populations.”

    From Utilization of fine needle aspiration cytology at Kamuzu central hospital (2018) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction and Conclusions (page unavailable) describe FNAB as accurate, less costly, and less invasive for diagnosing pediatric malignancies. The section on pediatric cytopathology in different practice settings says cytology can quickly diagnose infectious diseases in resource-limited areas. The paper does not establish these qualities for adults, and it says FNAB remains underused for pediatric malignancies in the United States, rather than being widely accepted across settings. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • FNAC provides a definitive tissue diagnosis to fill in the gap for many diagnostic dilemmas especially when used in conjunction with cell block and IHC studies.

    “FNAC provides a definitive tissue diagnosis to fill in the gap for many diagnostic dilemmas[8–12] especially when used in conjunction with cell block and IHC studies.”

    From Utilization of fine needle aspiration cytology at Kamuzu central hospital (2018) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Clear Cell Pattern section (page unavailable) says a specific cytologic diagnosis is often possible with ancillary studies including IHC, supporting the central point. But the paper addresses pediatric malignancies, does not present cell blocks as a general solution, and cautions in Pitfalls and Limitations (page unavailable) that FNAB cannot always provide a definitive classification. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]15. Howell LP. Changing role of fine-needle aspiration on the evalua- tion of pediatric masses. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;24:65-70.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monaco, S. E., & Teot, L. A.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Teot, Lisa A.
Venue
Cancer Cytopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-06
Volume
122
Issue
5
Pages
322-336
ISSN
  • 1934-662X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-6638
OpenAlex
W2132304562
Cited by
12
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cytopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
pediatric malignancies, fine needle aspiration cytology, cytopathology, differential diagnosis, cytomorphologic features, childhood cancer epidemiology, resource-limited settings, ancillary studies
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Cytodiagnosis, Humans, Neoplasms, Biopsy, Fine-Needle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review