Cited by 45Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchColorectal and Anal CarcinomasGenital Health and Disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The performance of anal cytology as a screening test for anal HSILs in homosexual men.

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies regarding the performance of anal cytology in which both the screening test (cytology) and the diagnostic test (high-resolution anoscopy [HRA]) are performed in all members of a screening population are rare. The authors evaluated the performance of liquid-based anal cytology in a cohort of homosexual men in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. METHODS: The Study of the Prevention of Anal Cancer (SPANC) is a 3-year prospective study of the natural history of anal human papillomavirus infection in homosexual men aged ≥35 years. At baseline, all participants underwent a liquid-based anal cytology test and HRA at the same clinical visit. Biopsies were obtained for histological assessment if lesions suspicious for human papillomavirus infection were visible during HRA. Using any cytological abnormality as the threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated against histologically diagnosed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs). RESULTS: Among 617 men recruited, the median age was 49 years (range, 35-79 years) and 35.7% were positive for the human immunodeficiency virus. Overall, the sensitivity of cytology was 83.2%, the specificity was 52.6%, the positive predictive value was 45.8%, and the negative predictive value was 86.7%. Specificity improved with increasing age (P for trend =.041). Sensitivity was significantly higher in men with >1 anal octant of biopsy-confirmed HSIL (92.9% vs 77.7%; P = .010), and in those who had ≥10 metaplastic cells present on their cytology slides (87.5% vs 70.2%; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Anal cytology was found to have a higher specificity in older men while maintaining sensitivity. Sensitivity was higher among those with more extensive HSILs and men with metaplastic cells present on cytology. Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124:415-24. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncy.21702

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensitivity and specificity of anal cytology to detect HSIL are limited (sensitivity 55%-89% and specificity 40%-67%).

    “Sensitivity and specificity of anal cytology to detect HSIL are limited (sensitivity 55%–89% and specificity 40%–67%) (1286–1291).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [1286]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jin, F., Grulich, A. E., Poynten, I. M., Hillman, R. J., Templeton, D. J., Law, C. L. H., Farnsworth, A., Garland, S. M., Fairley, C. K., Roberts, J. M., & and on behalf of the SPANC Study Team
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
  • Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology (AU)
  • Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
  • Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Jin, Fengyi
Venue
Cancer Cytopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-24
Volume
124
Issue
6
Pages
415-424
ISSN
  • 1934-662X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-6638
OpenAlex
W2283065470
Cited by
45
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cytopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Australian Government
  • University of New South Wales
  • Sanofi Pasteur
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1016307, 1013353, 568971, 1081175)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
Keywords
anal cytology, liquid-based cytology, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, anal cancer screening, gay men, HPV infection, high-resolution anoscopy, diagnostic accuracy, metaplastic cells, HIV-positive men
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anus Neoplasms, Australia, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Cytodiagnosis, Female, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, HIV Infections, Homosexuality, Male, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review