The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visualization of S100B‐positive neurons and glia in the central nervous system of EGFP transgenic mice
Abstract
S100B, the EF‐hand Ca++‐binding protein with gliotrophic and neurotrophic properties implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, is coined as a glial marker, despite its documented presence in rodent brain neurons. We have generated a transgenic mouse whose EGFP reporter, controlled by the −1669/+3106 sequence of the murine S100B gene, allows the direct microscopic observation of most S100B‐expressing cells in the central nervous system (CNS). From embryonic day 13 onward, EGFP expression was targeted to selected neuroepithelial, glial, and neuronal cells, indicating that cell‐specific expression of S100B is regulated at the transcriptional level during development. In adult mice, the highest level of EGFP expression was found in ependymocytes; astrocytes; and spinal, medullar, pontine, and deep cerebellar S100B neurons. Our results, thus, agree with earlier reports suggesting that S100B is not a CNS glial‐specific marker. In addition, we detected EGFP and S100B in forebrain neurons previously thought not to express S100B in the mouse, including neurons of primary motor and somatosensory neocortical areas, the ventral pallidum and prerubral field. Another interesting finding was the selected EGFP targeting to neonatal S100B oligodendrocytes and adult NG2 progenitors as opposed to mature S100B oligodendrocytes. This finding suggests that, except for oligodendrocytes at the last stage of myelin maturation, the −1669/+3106 sequence of the S100B gene is a useful reagent for driving expression of transgenes in most S100B‐expressing cells of mouse brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 457:404–419, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Donato, R. (2001) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s1357-2725(01)00046-2 · Cited by 1,580
Cited by
Verkhratsky, A., & Nedergaard, M. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00042.2016 · Cited by 1,678
Donato, R., R. Cannon, B., Sorci, G., Riuzzi, F., Hsu, K., J. Weber, D., & L. Geczy, C. (2013) · Current Molecular Medicine · doi:10.2174/156652413804486214 · Cited by 1,316
S100B's double life: Intracellular regulator and extracellular signal
Donato, R., Sorci, G., Riuzzi, F., Arcuri, C., Bianchi, R., Brozzi, F., Tubaro, C., & Giambanco, I. (2009) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.11.009 · Cited by 731
TAM receptors regulate multiple features of microglial physiology
Fourgeaud, L., Través, P. G., Tufail, Y., Leal-Bailey, H., Lew, E. D., Burrola, P. G., Callaway, P., Zagórska, A., Rothlin, C. V., Nimmerjahn, A., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17630 · Cited by 600
WANG, D., & BORDEY, A. (2008) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.015 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Vives, V., Alonso, G., Solal, A. C., Joubert, D., & Legraverend, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-30
- Volume
- 457
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 404-419
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2136417710
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visualization of S100B‐positive neurons and glia in the central nervous system of EGFP transgenic mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.10552
- The paper
- Vives, V., Alonso, G., Solal, A. C., Joubert, D., & Legraverend, C. (2003). Visualization of S100B‐positive neurons and glia in the central nervous system of EGFP transgenic mice. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.