Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 536

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time course of early motor and neuropathological anomalies in a knock‐in mouse model of Huntington's disease with 140 CAG repeats

Menalled, Liliana B., Sison, Jessica D., Dragatsis, Ioannis, Zeitlin, Scott, Chesselet, Marie‐Françoise·2003·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Huntington's disease (HD) is caused by an abnormal expansion of CAG repeats in the gene encoding huntingtin. The development of therapies for HD requires preclinical testing of drugs in animal models that reproduce the dysfunction and regionally specific pathology observed in HD. We have developed a new knock‐in mouse model of HD with a chimeric mouse/human exon 1 containing 140 CAG repeats inserted in the murine huntingtin gene. These mice displayed an increased locomotor activity and rearing at 1 month of age, followed by hypoactivity at 4 months and gait anomalies at 1 year. Behavioral symptoms preceded neuropathological anomalies, which became intense and widespread only at 4 months of age. These consisted of nuclear staining for huntingtin and huntingtin‐containing nuclear and neuropil aggregates that first appeared in the striatum, nucleus accumbens, and olfactory tubercle. Interestingly, regions with early pathology all receive dense dopaminergic inputs, supporting accumulating evidence for a role of dopamine in HD pathology. Nuclear staining and aggregates predominated in striatum and layer II/III and deep layer V of the cerebral cortex, whereas neuropil aggregates were found in the globus pallidus and layer IV/superficial layer V of the cerebral cortex. The olfactory system displayed early and marked aggregate accumulation, which may be relevant to the early deficit in odor discrimination observed in patients with HD. Because of their early behavioral anomalies and regionally specific pathology, these mice provide a powerful tool with which to evaluate the effectiveness of new therapies and to study the mechanisms involved in the neuropathology of HD. J. Comp. Neurol. 465:11–26, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.10776

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 536

Metadata

Authors
Menalled, L. B., Sison, J. D., Dragatsis, I., Zeitlin, S., & Chesselet, M.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08-12
Volume
465
Issue
1
Pages
11-26
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2158174988
Cited by
536
References
3
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time course of early motor and neuropathological anomalies in a knock‐in mouse model of Huntington's disease with 140 CAG repeats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.10776
The paper
Menalled, L. B., Sison, J. D., Dragatsis, I., Zeitlin, S., & Chesselet, M. (2003). Time course of early motor and neuropathological anomalies in a knock‐in mouse model of Huntington's disease with 140 CAG repeats. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10776

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.