Cited by 163Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingLysosomal Storage Disorders Research

Tissue-specific proteolysis of Huntingtin (htt) in human brain: Evidence of enhanced levels of N- and C-terminal htt fragments in Huntington’s disease striatum

Open access
Mende-Mueller, Liane M., Toneff, Thomas, Hwang, Shin-Rong, Chesselet, Marie-Francoise, Hook, Vivian Y. H.·2001·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Proteolysis of mutant huntingtin (htt) has been hypothesized to occur in Huntington's disease (HD) brains. Therefore, this in vivo study examined htt fragments in cortex and striatum of adult HD and control human brains by Western blots, using domain-specific anti-htt antibodies that recognize N- and C-terminal domains of htt (residues 181-810 and 2146-2541, respectively), as well as the 17 residues at the N terminus of htt. On the basis of the patterns of htt fragments observed, different "protease-susceptible domains" were identified for proteolysis of htt in cortex compared with striatum, suggesting that htt undergoes tissue-specific proteolysis. In cortex, htt proteolysis occurs within two different N-terminal domains, termed protease-susceptible domains "A" and "B." However, in striatum, a different pattern of fragments indicated that proteolysis of striatal htt occurred within a C-terminal domain termed "C," as well as within the N-terminal domain region designated "A". Importantly, striatum from HD brains showed elevated levels of 40-50 kDa N-terminal and 30-50 kDa C-terminal fragments compared with that of controls. Increased levels of these htt fragments may occur from a combination of enhanced production or retarded degradation of fragments. Results also demonstrated tissue-specific ubiquitination of certain htt N-terminal fragments in striatum compared with cortex. Moreover, expansions of the triplet-repeat domain of the IT15 gene encoding htt was confirmed for the HD tissue samples studied. Thus, regulated tissue-specific proteolysis and ubiquitination of htt occur in human HD brains. These results suggest that the role of huntingtin proteolysis should be explored in the pathogenic mechanisms of HD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.21-06-01830.2001

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unstable CAG repeats in exon 1 of HTT encode the N-terminal polyglutamine tract of the approximately 350 kDa, approximately 3100 amino acid huntingtin protein.

    “The unstable CAG repeats in exon 1 of HTT encode the N-terminal polyglutamine tract of the ~350 kDa, ~3100 amino acid huntingtin protein [163].”

    From The Impact of Neurotoxin Proteins Trafficked by Primary Cilia and Extracellular Vesicles in Neurodegenerative Diseases (2025) · cites this paper as [163]

    The paper’s introductory passage (page unavailable) links an N-terminal huntingtin fragment containing CAG repeats to exon 1 and describes a polyglutamine expansion in mutant huntingtin. The analysis of triplet repeats also documents expanded CAG repeats in HD samples. The passages found do not establish the claimed approximately 350 kDa mass or approximately 3100-amino-acid length. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mende-Mueller, L. M., Toneff, T., Hwang, S.-R., Chesselet, M.-F., & Hook, V. Y. H.
Affiliations
Buck Institute for Research on Aging (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2001-03-15
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1830-1837
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2101847922
Cited by
163
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Hereditary Disease Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH.NS 31862)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA092126)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Keywords
huntingtin, Huntington's disease, proteolysis, striatum, cerebral cortex, N-terminal fragment, C-terminal fragment, ubiquitination, trinucleotide repeat expansion, IT15 gene
MeSH terms
Huntingtin Protein, Aged, Antibody Specificity, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Striatum, Humans, Huntington Disease, Middle Aged, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Organ Specificity, Peptide Fragments, Peptide Hydrolases, Putamen, Ubiquitins, Blotting, Western, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review