The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuronal architecture of the mosquito deutocerebrum
Abstract
Mosquito behavior is heavily dependent on olfactory and mechanosensory cues, which are detected by receptor neurons on the antenna and on the palps. Recent progress in mosquito sensory genomics highlights the need for an up‐to‐date understanding of the neural architecture of the mosquito brain. Here we present a detailed description of the neural structure of the primary target of the majority of these neurons, the deutocerebrum, in the African malaria (Anopheles gambiae) and yellow fever (Aedes aegypti) mosquitoes. Special focus is made on the olfactory system, the antennal lobe (AL), where we present high‐resolution three‐dimensional models of the ALs of male and female Ae. aegypti. These models reveal a sexual dimorphism in the number of glomeruli, 49 and 50 glomeruli in male and female mosquitoes, respectively, and in the size of several of the identified glomeruli. The fine structure of receptor neuron terminations in the AL and the rest of the deutocerebrum is described, as are the arborizations of intrinsic deutocerebral neurons and neurons providing output to higher brain areas. In the AL a specific and very large center receiving input from the mechanosensory Johnston's organ is revealed as a multilobed structure receiving peripheral input according to a somatotopic pattern. Within the antennal nerve a specific neuropil containing early, bouton‐like ramifications of receptor neurons is described. Within the glomerular array of the AL, neurons providing a possible feedback circuit to antennal receptor neurons are shown. With these results we provide a new resolution in mosquito deutocerebral architecture. J. Comp. Neurol. 493:207–240, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A chemosensory gene family encoding candidate gustatory and olfactory receptors in Drosophila.
Scott, K., Brady, R., Cravchik, A., Morozov, P., Rzhetsky, A., Zuker, C., & Axel, R. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00263-x · Cited by 720
The mechanical basis of Drosophila audition
Göpfert, M. C., & Robert, D. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.9.1199 · Cited by 172
Cited by
Current topics in the epidemiology of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers
Gillison, M. L. (2007) · Head & Neck · doi:10.1002/hed.20573 · Cited by 305
Dekker, T., Ibba, I., Siju, K. P., Stensmyr, M. C., & Hansson, B. S. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.075 · Cited by 267
Self-citationComparative Neuroanatomy of the Lateral Accessory Lobe in the Insect Brain
Namiki, S., & Kanzaki, R. (2016) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00244 · Cited by 78
Lovick, J. K., Ngo, K. T., Omoto, J. J., Wong, D. C., Nguyen, J. D., & Hartenstein, V. (2013) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.07.008 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Ignell, R., Dekker, T., Ghaninia, M., & Hansson, B. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-27
- Volume
- 493
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-240
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2026023064
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.