The Resource Identification Initiative: a cultural shift in publishing
Open accessAbstract
A central tenet in support of research reproducibility is the ability to uniquely identify research resources, i.e., reagents, tools, and materials that are used to perform experiments. However, current reporting practices for research resources are insufficient to identify the exact resources that are reported or to answer basic questions such as “How did other studies use resource X?” To address this issue, the Resource Identification Initiative was launched as a pilot project to improve the reporting standards for research resources in the Methods sections of articles and thereby improve identifiability and scientific reproducibility. The pilot engaged over 25 biomedical journal editors from most major publishers, as well as scientists and funding officials. Authors were asked to include Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) in their articles prior to publication for three resource types: antibodies, model organisms, and tools (i.e., software and databases). RRIDs are assigned by an authoritative database, for example, a model organism database for each type of resource. To make it easier for authors to obtain RRIDs, resources were aggregated from the appropriate databases and their RRIDs made available in a central Web portal (http://scicrunch.org/resources). RRIDs meet three key criteria: they are machine‐readable, free to generate and access, and are consistent across publishers and journals. The pilot was launched in February of 2014 and over 300 articles have appeared that report RRIDs. The number of journals participating has expanded from the original 25 to more than 40, with RRIDs appearing in 62 different journals to date. Here we present an overview of the pilot project and its outcomes to date. We show that authors are able to identify resources and are supportive of the goals of the project. Identifiability of the resources post‐pilot showed a dramatic improvement for all three resource types, suggesting that the project has had a significant impact on identifiability of research resources. J. Comp. Neurol. 524:8–22, 2016. © 2015 The Authors The Journal of Comparative Neurology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RRIDs are unique and stable, allowing unambiguous identification of reagents or tools used in a study, aiding other researchers to replicate the methods.
“RRIDs are unique and stable, allowing unambiguous identification of reagents or tools used in a study, aiding other researchers to replicate the methods.”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [127]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641 · see citing works
Gronenschild, E. H. B. M., Habets, P., Jacobs, H. I. L., Mengelers, R., Rozendaal, N., van Os, J., & Marcelis, M. C. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038234 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Vasilevsky, N. A., Brush, M. H., Paddock, H., Ponting, L., Tripathy, S. J., LaRocca, G. M., & Haendel, M. A. (2013) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.148 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Neuroscience Information Framework: A Data and Knowledge Environment for Neuroscience
Gardner, D., Akil, H., Ascoli, G. A., Bowden, D. M., Bug, W. J., Donohue, D. E., Goldberg, D. H., Grafstein, B., Grethe, J. S., Gupta, A., et al. (2008) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-008-9024-z · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Self-citationMinimal NF-κB activity in neurons
LISTWAK, S. J., Rathore, P., & Herkenham, M. A. (2013) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.013 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Treatment needs and diagnosis awareness in primary care patients with chronic kidney disease
McIntyre, N. J., Fluck, R., McIntyre, C. W., & Taal, M. W. (2012) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp12x636047 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Hupé, J. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00018 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Cautionary notes on the use of NF-κB p65 and p50 antibodies for CNS studies
Herkenham, M. A., Rathore, P., Brown, P., & Listwak, S. J. (2011) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/1742-2094-8-141 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Cone, A. C., Ambrosi, C., Scemes, E., Martone, M. E., & Sosinsky, G. E. (2013) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2013.00006 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationÖzyurt, İ. B., Grethe, J. S., Martone, M. E., & Bandrowski, A. E. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146300 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationMarenco, L. N., Wang, R., Bandrowski, A. E., Grethe, J. S., Shepherd, G. M., & Miller, P. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2014.00058 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationCapes‐Davis, A., Alston‐Roberts, C., Barrett, T., Burnett, E. C., Cooper, J. R., Dirks, W. G., Freshney, R. I., Fuller, J. R., Healy, L. E., Kerrigan, L., et al. (2014) · Leukemia Research · doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2014.05.003 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
An Investigation of the Specificity of Research Antibodies against NF-κB-subunit p65
Slotta, C., Müller, J., Tran, L., Hauser, S., Widera, D., Kaltschmidt, B., & Kaltschmidt, C. (2013) · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · doi:10.1369/0022155413515484 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Enhanced consumption of salient solutions following pedunculopontine tegmental lesions
MacLaren, D. A. A., Markovic, T., Daniels, D., & Clark, S. D. (2014) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.09.075 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Promoting research resource identification at JCN
Bandrowski, A. E., Tan, S. C., & Hof, P. R. (2014) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.23585 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0
Percie du Sert, N., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 · Cited by 2,677 · see citing works
Reporting animal research: Explanation and Elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2019Preprint
du Sert, N. P., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/703355 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic
Besançon, L., Peiffer‐Smadja, N., Ségalas, C., Jiang, H., Masuzzo, P., Smout, C., Billy, E., Déforet, M., & Leyrat, C. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Enhanced validation of antibodies for research applications
Edfors, F., Hober, A., Linderbäck, K., Maddalo, G., Azimi, A., Sivertsson, Å., Tegel, H., Hober, S., Szigyarto, C. A., Fagerberg, L., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06642-y · Cited by 100 · see citing works
The Antibody Registry: ten years of registering antibodies
Bandrowski, A. E., Pairish, M., Eckmann, P., Grethe, J. S., & Martone, M. E. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac927 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods
Menke, J., Roelandse, M., Ozyurt, B., Martone, M., & Bandrowski, A. (2020) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101698 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationGoodwin, N. L., Nilsson, S. R. O., Choong, J. J., & Golden, S. A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2022.102544 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Bandrowski, A. E., & Martone, M. E. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.030 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationReproducibility in Computational Neuroscience Models and Simulations
McDougal, R., Bulanova, A. S., & Lytton, W. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2539602 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions
Kilicoglu, H. (2017) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx057 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Labbé, C., Grima, N., Gautier, T., Favier, B., & Byrne, J. A. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213266 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 PandemicPreprint
Besançon, L., Peiffer‐Smadja, N., Ségalas, C., Jiang, H., Masuzzo, P., Smout, C., Billy, É., Déforet, M., & Leyrat, C. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.13.249847 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Reiser, L., Berardini, T., Li, D., Muller, R., Strait, E., Li, Q., Mezheritsky, Y., Vetushko, A., & Huala, E. (2016) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baw018 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The antibodies don’t work! The race to rid labs of molecules that ruin experiments
Kwon, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-024-03590-0 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
New Views of Old Proteins: Clarifying the Enigmatic Proteome
Burnum-Johnson, K., Conrads, T., Drake, R., Herr, A., Iyengar, R., Kelly, R. T., Lundberg, E., MacCoss, M., Naba, A., Nolan, G., et al. (2021) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2022.100254 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Curran, M. P., Lazzarini, G. A., Baumgart, L., Gabel, V. M., Blockeel, J., Epple, R., Stolze, M., & Schader, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.554362 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Antibody characterization is critical to enhance reproducibility in biomedical research
Kahn, R. A., Virk, H., Laflamme, C., Houston, D. W., Polinski, N. K., Meijers, R., Levey, A. I., Saper, C. B., Errington, T. M., Turn, R. E., et al. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.100211 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationData Publications Correlate with Citation Impact
Leitner, F., Bielza, C., Hill, S., & Larrañaga, P. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00419 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationSuarez, C. G. H., Bucheli, V., & Ordóñez, H. (2023) · Tecnura · doi:10.14483/22487638.19637 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Forecasting the Spreading of Technologies in Research Communities
Osborne, F., Mannocci, A., & Motta, E. (2017) · International Conference on Knowledge Capture · doi:10.1145/3148011.3148030 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Reporting In Vitro Experiments Responsibly – the RIVER RecommendationsPreprint
The RIVER working group (2023) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/x6aut · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Manuel, S. L., Johnson, B. W., Frevert, C. W., & Duncan, F. E. (2018) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1093/biolre/ioy094 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
TechMiner: Extracting Technologies from Academic Publications
Osborne, F., de Ribaupierre, H., & Motta, E. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_30 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Engineered Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines for Validation of CAR T Cell Function
Repellin, C. E., Ganesan, P., Alcudia, J. F., Lakshmireddy, H. K. D., Patel, P. D., Beviglia, L., Javitz, H. S., Sambucetti, L. C., & Bhatnagar, P. (2019) · Advanced Biosystems · doi:10.1002/adbi.201900224 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Misidentified biomedical resources: Journal guidelines are not a quick fix
Hepkema, W. M., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Hoek, J. M., & Halffman, W. (2021) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.33882 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Neuroinformatics for Degenerate Brains
Schutter, E. D. (2015) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-015-9294-1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Suarez, C. G. H., Bucheli, V., Restrepo‐Calle, F., & Gonzalez, F. A. (2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98998-3_27 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
MALDI-TOF-MS-Based Identification of Monoclonal Murine Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies within One Hour
Tscheuschner, G., Kaiser, M. N., Lisec, J., Beslic, D., Muth, T., Krüger, M., Mages, H. W., Dorner, B. G., Knospe, J., Schenk, J. A., et al. (2022) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib11020027 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hsu, C., Bandrowski, A. E., Gillespie, T., Udell, J., Lin, K., Özyurt, İ. B., Grethe, J. S., & Martone, M. E. (2019) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2019.2952838 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationConference report: Biocuration 2021 Virtual Conference
Quaglia, F., Balakrishnan, R., Bello, S. M., & Vasilevsky, N. (2022) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baac027 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationSchrade, L., Mah, N., Bandrowski, A. E., Chen, Y., Dewender, J., Diecke, S., Hiepen, C., Lancaster, M. A., Marquès‐Bonet, T., Martínez, S., et al. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14111541 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationYaniv, Z. R., Anidi, I. U., Arakkal, L., Arroyo-Mejías, A., Beuschel, R. T., Börner, K., Chu, C. J., Clark, B., Clatworthy, M. R., Colautti, J., et al. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105737.3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
An evaluation of the status of living collections for plant, environmental, and microbial research
McCluskey, K., Parsons, J. P., Quach, K., & Duke, C. S. (2017) · Journal of Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12038-017-9685-6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Minimal Information about MHC Multimers (MIAMM)
Vita, R., Mody, A., Overton, J. A., Buus, S., Haley, S. T., Sette, A., Mallajosyula, V. V. A., Davis, M. M., Long, D. L., Willis, R. A., et al. (2022) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.2100961 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Yaniv, Z. R., Anidi, I., Arakkal, L., Arroyo-Mejias, A. J., Beuschel, R., Börner, K., Chu, C. J., Clark, B. H., Clatworthy, M., Colautti, J., et al. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105737 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ehlers, L., Kirchner, M., Mertins, P., Strehl, C., Buttgereit, F., & Gaber, T. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23095049 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The science of science: Clinical Science launches a new translational meta-research collection
Weissgerber, T. L. (2021) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20210777 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Reflections on Endocrinology, 2013–2017
Gore, A. C., & Hammes, S. R. (2017) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2017-00886
Publication Guidelines for Optimized Multiparameter Immunolabeling Panels ( OMIPs )
Cosma, A., Brodie, T. M., Filby, A. J., Jaimes, M. C., Niesner, R. A., Schmidt, A., & Mahnke, Y. D. (2026) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.70045
Restructuring Scientific Papers for Human and AI Readers
Lin, Z. (2026) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459261480685
FAIRsharing record for: Minimal Information about MHC Multimers
FAIRsharing Team, Vita, R., & Vita, R. (2022) · FAIRsharing.org · doi:10.25504/fairsharing.06877d
- Authors
- Bandrowski, A., Brush, M., Grethe, J. S., Haendel, M. A., Kennedy, D. N., Hill, S., Hof, P. R., Martone, M. E., Pols, M., Tan, S. C., Washington, N., Zudilova‐Seinstra, E., & Vasilevsky, N.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Center for Research in Biological Systems UCSD La Jolla California USA
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Scientific Outreach Executive London UK
- John Wiley & Sons (United States) (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Elsevier BV (Netherlands) (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bandrowski, Anita
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-11-19
- Volume
- 524
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-22
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- PMC
- PMC4684178
- OpenAlex
- W2266909730
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R24OD011883, 5u24da039832-02)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (HHSN271200577531C, U24-DA039832)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U24DK097771)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (HHSN271200800035C)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- research reproducibility, immunoglobulins, model organisms, scientific instruments, journal editorial policy
- MeSH terms
- Data Accuracy, Animals, Antibodies, Pilot Projects, Publishing, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Internet, Models, Animal, Data Curation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review