The olivary peduncle and other fiber projections of the superior olivary complex

Rasmussen, Grant Litster·1946·Journal of Comparative Neurology

DOI 10.1002/cne.900840204

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.900840204

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior
Thompson, R. F., & Spencer, W. A. (1966) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0022681 · Cited by 2,608
Anatomy of cochlear innervation
Spoendlin, H. (1985) · American Journal of Otolaryngology · doi:10.1016/s0196-0709(85)80026-0 · Cited by 124
Analysis of the short wavelength-sensitive (?blue?) cone mosaic in the primate retina: Comparison of New World and Old World monkeys
(1999) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990329)406:1<1::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-1

Authors: Rasmussen, G. L.
Venue: Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 1946-04
Volume: 84
Issue: 2
Pages: 141-219
ISSN: 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
1096-9861
DOI: 10.1002/cne.900840204
OpenAlex: W1964714724
Cited by: 668
References: 0
FWCI: 1.24
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review