Cited by 124Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsVestibular and auditory disordersHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Anatomy of cochlear innervation

Spoendlin, Heinrich·1985·American Journal of Otolaryngology

Abstract

In this review of cochlear innervation, the differences in the innervation of outer and inner hair cells are emphasized. Of the afferent neurons, 90 to 95 per cent are large, myelinated type I neurons, exclusively connected in an essentially radial unbranched manner to the inner hair cells; 5 to 10 per cent are small, mostly unmyelinated type II neurons connected to the outer hair cells with considerable spiral extension and branching. The few small type II neurons, with their thin unmyelinated axons, probably have a minor functional importance for centripetal information transfer. The functional emphasis of the outer hair cell system is likely at the level of the receptor cells where the outer hair cells monitor receptor function. The efferent innervation also consists of at least two types of neurons. Small neurons from the lateral superior olivary nucleus project to the inner hair cell area in a predominantly homolateral fashion, making almost exclusively synaptic contacts with the afferent dendrites associated with the inner hair cells. Larger neurons from the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body and periolivary nucleus provide the abundant efferent nerve supply of the outer hair cells, predominantly contralateral. They have mostly large synaptic contacts, and, in some species exclusively, with the receptor cells, indicating again the functional emphasis of the outer hair cell system at the receptor cell level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0196-0709(85)80026-0

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Type IIs make up only a small fraction (~5%) of cochlear afferents, the great majority being myelinated type I afferents postsynaptic to inner hair cells.

    “Type IIs make up only a small fraction (~5%) of cochlear afferents, the great majority being myelinated type I afferents postsynaptic to inner hair cells (30, 31).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spoendlin, H.
Corresponding author
Spoendlin, Heinrich
Venue
American Journal of Otolaryngology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-11
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
453-467
ISSN
0196-0709 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095450347
Cited by
124
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
cochlear innervation, inner hair cells, outer hair cells, sensory neurons, type I neurons, efferent innervation, lateral superior olivary nucleus, medial nucleus of the trapezoid body, myelinated axons, receptor cells, auditory nerve
MeSH terms
Animals, Cochlea, Cochlear Nerve, Hair Cells, Auditory, Hair Cells, Auditory, Inner, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Nerve Fibers, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neurons, Afferent, Neurons, Efferent, Organ of Corti

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review