Cited by 71Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

The role of central midbrain structures in conditioned responding to aversive noise in the rat

Lyon, Melvin·1964·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901220310

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyon, M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Lyon, Melvin
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1964-06
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
407-429
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2006157267
Cited by
71
References
30
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
conditioned responding, conditioned aversion, noise aversion
MeSH terms
Animals, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Psychological, Diencephalon, Mesencephalon, Noise, Research, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review