The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigation of glial cells in semithin sections. II. Variation with age in the numbers of the various glial cell types in rat cortex and corpus callosum
Abstract
Semithin Epon sections stained with toluidine blue were used to enumerate astrocytes, microglia, the three subtypes of oligodendrocytes, and cells referred to as free subependymal cells, in the corpus callosum and cerebral cortex of male Sherman rats of various ages. The period covered extended from a few days before weaning (3/4 month of age) until the time when growth became negligible (5 months of age). The total number of glial cells increases with age in both cortex and corpus callosum. However, the investigation of individual cell types reveals that the number of microglia remains fairly constant throughout the period under study. The number of astrocytes in corpus callosum increases up to the age of one month, but remains constant thereafter, while their number in the cortex is the same at all investigated times. In the case of oligodendrocytes, the three subtypes behave differently. About two‐thirds of the oligodendrocytes in rats aged three‐quarters of a month are of the light or medium shade types, but the number of these gradually decreases with age and becomes very low in five‐month‐old rats. In contrast, the dark cells which constitute about one‐third of the oligodendrocytes in young rats make up nearly the whole of this group in adults. Finally, free subependymal cells are absent in cortex throughout the period under study, but are present in corpus callosum, where their number steadily declines with age. In conclusion, the numbers of astrocytes and microglia seem to remain constant in growing rats after the age of one month. Dark oligodendrocytes markedly increase in number with age, while the other types of oligodendrocytes and the free subependymal cells are reduced to negligible numbers by the age of five months.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections
Abercrombie, M. (1946) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1090940210 · Cited by 4,363
Cited by
Prolonged glucocorticoid exposure reduces hippocampal neuron number: implications for aging
Sapolsky, R., Krey, L., & McEwen, B. (1985) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-05-01222.1985 · Cited by 1,129
von Bartheld, C. S., Bahney, J., & Herculano‐Houzel, S. (2016) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.24040 · Cited by 1,063
Dawson, M. (2003) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s1044-7431(03)00210-0 · Cited by 927
Sedgwick, J. D., Schwender, S., Imrich, H., Dörries, R., Butcher, G. W., & ter Meulen, V (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.16.7438 · Cited by 698
Dimou, L., Simon, C., Kirchhoff, F., Takebayashi, H., & Götz, M. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2831-08.2008 · Cited by 551
Metadata
- Authors
- Ling, E., & Leblond, C. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1973-05
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-81
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2008577142
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of glial cells in semithin sections. II. Variation with age in the numbers of the various glial cell types in rat cortex and corpus callosum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901490105
- The paper
- Ling, E., & Leblond, C. P. (1973). Investigation of glial cells in semithin sections. II. Variation with age in the numbers of the various glial cell types in rat cortex and corpus callosum. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901490105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.