Cited by 236Axon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Fine structure of dendritic and axonal growth cones in embryonic chick spinal cord

Skoff, Robert P., Hamburger, Viktor·1974·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Our preliminary electron microscopic observations of embryonic chick spinal cord indicate that the majority of synapses in the cervical cord at the fourth and sixth days of incubation are found in the marginal layer rather than the mantle layer. These findings raise two basic questions about the type of connections in the marginal zone during the first week of development: are all these early synapses axondendritic, and are synaptic junctions present on axonal and dendritic growth cones? Since criteria for distinguishing between axonal and dendritic growth cones are scarce or nonexistent, serial section electron microscopy was employed to definitively identify the two types of terminals. Two types of dendritic growth cones are present in the marginal layer during the first week of development. The first type is distinguished by a dendritic stalk which expands into a club‐shaped or bulb‐like terminal. A characteristic feature of this type of dendritic ending is the presence of numerous vesicles which vary in diameter from about 1000 Å to 2500 Å. Its cytoplasm has a floccular appearance and is frequently electron lucent. In contrast, the second type of dendritic terminal is electron dense, has a consistently homogeneous appearance, and usually lacks the large vesicles of the first type. The shape of the second type is a finger‐like process (filopodium) roughly of the same diameter as the main dendritic trunk. Evidence is presented that some dendritic growth cones observed in th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901530202

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skoff, R. P., & Hamburger, V.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-01-15
Volume
153
Issue
2
Pages
107-147
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2013411280
Cited by
236
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
axonal growth cones, synapses, marginal zone, mantle layer, synaptogenesis, axonal varicosities, filopodia, synaptic vesicles, ribosome, polysomes, synaptic vesicle exocytosis, synaptic vesicle recycling, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Chick Embryo, Dendrites, Epithelial Cells, Microscopy, Electron, Polyribosomes, Pseudopodia, Ribosomes, Spinal Cord, Synapses, Synaptic Membranes, Synaptic Vesicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review