The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ontogeny of monoamine neurons in the locus coeruleus, raphe nuclei and substantia nigra of the rat. I. Cell differentiation
Abstract
The onset of cell differentiation in the locus coeruleus, dorsal and medial raphe nuclei, and substantia nigra (zona compacta) was studied using the technique of long‐survival H 3‐thymidine autoradiography to date neurogenesis. Pregnant female rats were injected with isotope on day 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17 of gestation. Litters were born on day 22 and allowed to survive for 30 days. Brains were prepared for the fluorescence histochemical demonstration of monoamines or fixed by formalin perfusion. Autoradiography was carried out on sections adjacent to those in which monoamine‐nuclear groups were identified by the fluorescence method and also on sections from perfused brains, which were used to facilitate cell counting. The norepinephrine cells of the locus coeruleus began to differentiate (presence of heavily labelled cells) on days 10–13 of gestation, with a peak of heavy labelling on day 12, whereas the 5‐HT cells of the raphe nuclei and the dopamine cells of the substantia nigra began differentiating on days 11–15. In the dorsal raphe nucleus, the peak of heavy labelling occurred on day 14, whereas in the medial nucleus this took place on days 13–14. The substantia nigra, on the other hand, peaked on day 13. Cell differentiation was also studied in the cerebellar Purkinje cells and hippocampal macroneurons (pyramidal and polymorph cells) of areas CA3 and CA4, to which the locus coeruleus has been reported to project. Differentiation of these cells commenced on days 14–15 (Purkinje cells) and 13–18 (hippocampal cells), with both cell types peaking on day 15, a full three days after the peak of heavy labelling in the locus coeruleus. Evidence is discussed for the possible neurotrophic role of monoamine neurons in the neurogenesis of monoaminergic receptive cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dysregulation of the dopamine system in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and depression
Grace, A. A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.57 · Cited by 1,166
Adolescent cortical development: A critical period of vulnerability for addiction
Crews, F., He, J., & Hodge, C. (2007) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2006.12.001 · Cited by 1,091
Voorn, P., Kalsbeek, A., Jorritsma-Byham, B., & Groenewegen, H. J. (1988) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(88)90041-3 · Cited by 503
Stenevi, U., Bjo¨rklund, A., & Svendgaard, N.-A. (1976) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(76)91003-9 · Cited by 485
Development of prefrontal cortex
Kolk, S. M., & Rakic, P. (2022) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01137-9 · Cited by 378
Metadata
- Authors
- Lauder, J. M., & Bloom, F. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1974-06-15
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 469-481
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2127939929
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ontogeny of monoamine neurons in the locus coeruleus, raphe nuclei and substantia nigra of the rat. I. Cell differentiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901550407
- The paper
- Lauder, J. M., & Bloom, F. E. (1974). Ontogeny of monoamine neurons in the locus coeruleus, raphe nuclei and substantia nigra of the rat. I. Cell differentiation. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901550407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.