Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 655

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ontogeny of monoamine neurons in the locus coeruleus, raphe nuclei and substantia nigra of the rat. I. Cell differentiation

Lauder, Jean M., Bloom, Floyd E.·1974·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The onset of cell differentiation in the locus coeruleus, dorsal and medial raphe nuclei, and substantia nigra (zona compacta) was studied using the technique of long‐survival H 3‐thymidine autoradiography to date neurogenesis. Pregnant female rats were injected with isotope on day 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17 of gestation. Litters were born on day 22 and allowed to survive for 30 days. Brains were prepared for the fluorescence histochemical demonstration of monoamines or fixed by formalin perfusion. Autoradiography was carried out on sections adjacent to those in which monoamine‐nuclear groups were identified by the fluorescence method and also on sections from perfused brains, which were used to facilitate cell counting. The norepinephrine cells of the locus coeruleus began to differentiate (presence of heavily labelled cells) on days 10–13 of gestation, with a peak of heavy labelling on day 12, whereas the 5‐HT cells of the raphe nuclei and the dopamine cells of the substantia nigra began differentiating on days 11–15. In the dorsal raphe nucleus, the peak of heavy labelling occurred on day 14, whereas in the medial nucleus this took place on days 13–14. The substantia nigra, on the other hand, peaked on day 13. Cell differentiation was also studied in the cerebellar Purkinje cells and hippocampal macroneurons (pyramidal and polymorph cells) of areas CA3 and CA4, to which the locus coeruleus has been reported to project. Differentiation of these cells commenced on days 14–15 (Purkinje cells) and 13–18 (hippocampal cells), with both cell types peaking on day 15, a full three days after the peak of heavy labelling in the locus coeruleus. Evidence is discussed for the possible neurotrophic role of monoamine neurons in the neurogenesis of monoaminergic receptive cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901550407

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 655

Metadata

Authors
Lauder, J. M., & Bloom, F. E.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-06-15
Volume
155
Issue
4
Pages
469-481
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2127939929
Cited by
655
References
0
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ontogeny of monoamine neurons in the locus coeruleus, raphe nuclei and substantia nigra of the rat. I. Cell differentiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901550407
The paper
Lauder, J. M., & Bloom, F. E. (1974). Ontogeny of monoamine neurons in the locus coeruleus, raphe nuclei and substantia nigra of the rat. I. Cell differentiation. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901550407

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.