The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autoradiographic studies of the projections of the midbrain reticular formation: Descending projections of nucleus cuneiformis
Abstract
The descending projections of nucleus cuneiformis in the cat were traced by autoradiography in the transverse and sagittal planes following stereotaxically placed injections of 3 H‐leucine. Many descending axons are organized into distinct fiber systems, of which the largest and most well‐defined crosses directly in the midbrain and descends through the ventromedial tegmentum of the brain stem. This fiber system first terminates profusely in n. reticularis tegmenti pontis and then proceeds through the rhombencephalic tegmentum emitting transversely oriented branches to n. reticularis pontis caudalis and gigantocellularis, the raphe magnus and the facial nucleus. Its most caudal field of termination is a restricted portion of the medial accessory olive. Because of its size, compactness, and ventromedial course, this fiber system was termed the ventral tegmental bundle. In contrast, fibers descending on the ipsilateral side are more loosely organized and describe many divergent paths. In their initial course they remain in a dorsolateral position and distribute to the n. locus coeruleus, n. raphe dorsalis, the central gray matter, and n. reticularis pontis oralis. At successively more caudal levels they converge ventromedially and descend through the rhombencephalic tegmentum in a position similar to that of the ventral tegmental bundle. At the level of the facial nucleus a group of fibers splits off to form a separate fiber bundle which descends lateral to the inferior olive and distributes to the lateral reticular nucleus. No evidence was found of projections to the spinal cord or cerebellum. A portion of the tegmentum ventromedial to nucleus cuneiformis was found to project bilaterally to the facial nucleus and to the ipsilateral medial accessory olive. The results of this study are discussed in relation to the role of the midbrain reticular formation in the elaboration of certain forms of behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nucleus locus ceruleus: new evidence of anatomical and physiological specificity
Foote, S. L., Bloom, F. E., & Aston-Jones, G. (1983) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1983.63.3.844 · Cited by 1,901
Jones, B. E., & Yang, T. (1985) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902420105 · Cited by 896
The thalamus as a neuronal oscillator
STERIADE, M., & DESCHENES, M. (1984) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(84)90017-1 · Cited by 653
Anatomy of the Descending Pathways
Kuypers, H. G. J. M. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010213 · Cited by 640
Consciousness and the brainstem
Parvizi, J. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00127-x · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, S. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-06
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-358
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2066425999
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autoradiographic studies of the projections of the midbrain reticular formation: Descending projections of nucleus cuneiformis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901610306
- The paper
- Edwards, S. B. (1975). Autoradiographic studies of the projections of the midbrain reticular formation: Descending projections of nucleus cuneiformis. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901610306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.