The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional organization in the visual cortex of the golden hamster
Abstract
The visual cortex of the golden hamster was studied by means of multi‐unit and single unit recording, which revealed three separate retinotopic maps of the visual field in the posterior cortex. V1, corresponding to cytoarchitectonic area 17, has the contralateral temporal field represented medially, the central visual field (extending about 10 deg ipsilateral) represented laterally and the lower field anteriorly. The borders of the map, especially for the upper field, seem to be more restricted than the whole visual field available to the contralateral hemiretina: V1 probably does not represent the extreme periphery of the field. A large fraction of V1 has binocular input, for up to about 50 deg lateral to the vertical midline. There is a retinotopic reversal near the representation of the vertical midline where V1 meets V2 (corresponding to the more lateral “area 18a”). There is another retinotopic reversal at the extremity of the contralateral field representation, where V1 meets Vm (the medial visual area, corresponding to “area 18”) V2 and Vm each contain a reduced mirror image version of the map in V1. Almost all isolated single units in V1 have receptive fields that can be classified as radially symmetrical (60%) or asymmetrical (35%) Symmetrical fields have ON (13%) OFF (4%) ON‐OFF (30%) or “SILENT” (12%) central areas when plotted with flashing spots. There are minor but not striking differences between these groups in their field sizes, velocity preferences and so on. They almost invariably prefer moving to stationary stimuli but are not selective for orientation or direction of movement. Asymmetrical fields are of four types, three of which (type 1, 11% type 2, 17% and type 3, 2%) are orientation selective and resemble simple, complex and hypercomplex cells in the cat cortex. Some of these have direction as well as orientation preference. Axial movement detectors (5%) have a selectivity for one axis of motion, and thus prefer one orientation of edge, but respond equally well to movement of a spot. Vertical and horizontal orientation preferences, especially the latter, are much the most common. There is some evidence of clustering of cells according to receptive field type and, possibly, preferred orientation. Asymmetrical cells are, relatively, somewhat rarer in the deeper cortical layers. Within the binocular segment, fully 89%of cells are binocularly driven and the receptive fields are similar in the two eyes. Receptive fields tend to increase in size away from the area centralis representation and, in a complementary fashion, the magnification factor decreases from up to 0.1 mm/deg at the area centralis representation to about 0.02 mm/deg for the peripheral field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbit's retina
Levick, W. R. (1967) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008140 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Cortical connections between rat cingulate cortex and visual, motor, and postsubicular cortices
Vogt, B. A., & Miller, M. W. (1983) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902160207 · Cited by 527
Hierarchical organization of areas in rat visual cortex
Coogan, T., & Burkhalter, A. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-09-03749.1993 · Cited by 265
Simmons, P. A., Lemmon, V., & Pearlman, A. L. (1982) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902110308 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Y‐C, T., & Blakemore, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-08-15
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 459-481
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2058189940
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional organization in the visual cortex of the golden hamster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901680403
- The paper
- Y‐C, T., & Blakemore, C. (1976). Functional organization in the visual cortex of the golden hamster. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901680403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.