Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Radioautographic investigation of gliogenesis in the corpus callosum of young rats II. Origin of microglial cells

Imamoto, Kikuko, Leblond, C. P.·1978·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Microglial cells are absent from the corpus callosum of newborn rats. In the hope of finding out when and how microglial cells appear with age, 3 H‐thymidine was given intraperitoneally as single or three shortly spaced injections to 5‐day‐old rats weighing about 15 g; and these animals were sacrificed at various time intervals from 2 hours to 35 days later. Pieces of corpus callosum were taken near the superior lateral angle of the lateral ventricles; and semithin sections were radioautographed and stained with toluidine blue. The corpus callosum of 5‐day‐old rats is composed of loosely arranged unmyelinated fibers and scattered cells. Among these cells, microglia are rare; there are a few astrocytes, many immature glial cells, rare pericytes, and 6‐7% of phagocytic “ameboid cells” consisting of a few monocytes and many macrophages. In the animals sacrificed two hours after 3 H‐thymidine administration, label is present only in immature cells and “ameboid cells.” As time elapses and the fibers of corpus callosum become myelinated, oligodendrocytes and, later, microglial cells appear. At the age of 12 days, microglial cells are present in substantial number; and by 19 days, the number doubles to reach a plateau. Many of the new microglial cells are labeled, e.g., 78.1% in 12‐day‐old animals (7 days after 3 H‐thymidine administration). The labeled microglial cells must have come from the transformation of cells that acquired label early, that is, from the immature cells or the “ameboid cells.” The height of the peaks of labeling – 59.8% at nine days for immature cells and 77.8% at 12 days for “ameboid cells” – points to the latter as precursors of the highly labeled microglial cells. Furthermore, the “ameboid cells” disappear as microglial cells appear and there are transitional elements between these two cell types. Cell counts suggest that about a third of the “ameboid cells” transform into microglial cells, while the others degenerate and die. Thus, the microglial cells which appear in the corpus callosum during the first three weeks of life result from transformation of the “ameboid cells” – a group of macrophages showing various stages of transition from monocytes. As for the occasional microglial cell appearing after the third week or in the adult, they presumably come directly from monocytes. In either case, monocytes would be the intial precursors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901800109

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Imamoto, K., & Leblond, C. P.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-07
Volume
180
Issue
1
Pages
139-163
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2071099949
Cited by
234
References
0
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radioautographic investigation of gliogenesis in the corpus callosum of young rats II. Origin of microglial cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901800109
The paper
Imamoto, K., & Leblond, C. P. (1978). Radioautographic investigation of gliogenesis in the corpus callosum of young rats II. Origin of microglial cells. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901800109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.