Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence for two organizational plans within the somatic sensory‐motor cortex of the rat

Donoghue, John P., Kerman, Karen L., Ebner, Ford F.·1979·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Previous electrophysiological mapping of somatic sensory (SI) and motor (MI) cortex in the rat has shown that these functional regions are completely overlapping in the hindlimb (HL) area. Partially separate in the forelimb area, and completel separate in the face area. The present studies were designed to show how the sensory and motor thalamic relay nuclei priject onto separate or overlapping subdivisions of SI and MI cortex. The experimental sequence involved physiological mapping of one subdivision of SI or MI cortex and then injecting horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as a retrograde cell marker to back‐fill the thalamic neurons that project to the identified area of cortex. The central issue was to compare the projection of the lemniscal‐recipient ventrobasal nucleus (VB) and the cerebellar‐recipient ventrolateral nucleus (VL) to the hindlimb and face subdivision of SI and MI cortex. Various authors, however have divided the ventral nucleus differently using Nisslstained transverse sections through the thalamus. Therefore, tritiated amino acids were also injected into the deep cerebellar nuclei and the distribution of cerebellar fiber terminals in the ventral nucleus was used as another criterion to identify the border between VB and VL. Following HRP injections in physiologically identified HL cortex, labelled neurons were present in both VB an VL. Face area SI injections back‐filled cells in VB (but not VL), while face area MI injections back‐filled cells in VL (but not VB). Neurons in the intralminar nuclei and the posterior nuclear complex were labelled after all injections. These results demonstrate that SI and MI cortex in the rat shows a combiation of overlapping and separated plans of organization. Other species, in which both the anatomical an physiological information is available, show other organizational plans. In the Virginia opssum, for example, overlap is present in all subregions of SI and MI cortex. While the Rhesus monkey shows separation of these areas. The result suggest that different mammals have evolved different degrees of separation of SI and MI cortex. Our results predict that in every case where there is evidence of sensory and motor overlap, there will be anatomical convergence of VB and VL projections to htat single cortical area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901830312

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Donoghue, J. P., Kerman, K. L., & Ebner, F. F.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-02
Volume
183
Issue
3
Pages
647-663
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2020423064
Cited by
232
References
0
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for two organizational plans within the somatic sensory‐motor cortex of the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901830312
The paper
Donoghue, J. P., Kerman, K. L., & Ebner, F. F. (1979). Evidence for two organizational plans within the somatic sensory‐motor cortex of the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901830312

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.