Cited by 285Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Further observations on hippocampal neurons in dispersed cell culture

Banker, Gary A., Cowan, W. Maxwell·1979·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The growth of the processes of dissociated hippocampal neurons from 18- to 20-day-old rat fetuses has been studied in vitro using a method that permits cells to be maintained at relatively low plating densities for periods up to three weeks (Banker and Cowan, '77). Most of the cells are spherical or ovoid when they first attach to the substratum (either polylysine or collagen) but within 24 to 48 hours they begin to put out processes, and by the end of the first week in culture a significant proportion (approximately 45%) come to resemble normal pyramidal cells with a more-or-less triangular shaped soma, a single dominant dendrite-like process emerging from the apex of the soma, and several "basal dendrites" arising from the opposite pole of the cell. Comparisons of the lengths of these dendrite-like processes with those of hippocampal cells in the brains of animals sacrificed on the fourth post-natal day and impregnated by a variant of the Golgi-Cox method, indicate that in some cases the rate of process formation in vitro approximates that in vivo and that the general form of the neurons is remarkably like that of immature pyramidal cells. After a week in culture a second type of process can be recognized. These tend to be finer than those we have identified as dendrites; they are relatively uniform in diameter, frequently give off branches at right angles, and in the electron microscope can be seen to form synapses upon the larger processes and cell somata. These axon-like…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901870302

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 285

Authors
Banker, G. A., & Cowan, W. M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-10
Volume
187
Issue
3
Pages
469-493
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1993940179
Cited by
285
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
hippocampal neurons, dendrite formation, pyramidal neurons, immature neurons, RNA localization, uridine incorporation, synaptogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Dendrites, Hippocampus, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Microscopy, Phase-Contrast, RNA, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review