The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organization of the amygdalopetal projections from modality‐specific cortical association areas in the monkey
Abstract
As part of an attempt to understand how sensory stimuli influence emotional processes we examined all of the telencephalic sensory systems of the rhesus monkey for efferents to the amygdala and immediately surrounding structures, using primarily the Fink‐Heimer technique. The results support the following conclusions. 1. All sensory systems contain areas that project to the amygdaloid complex (the somatosensory system, tentatively so), but not to more central limbic structures in the basal forebrain and hypothalamus. Consequently, whatever influence the sensory systems have on emotional processes mediated by these more central limbic structures is likely to depend largely on relays through the amygdala. 2. Except for the olfactory system, the amygdalopetal projections arise only from the later stages of cortical processing within each sensory system, i.e., from the modality‐specific association areas one or more steps removed from the primary sensory areas. Thus, the modality‐specific cortical sources of the amygdalopetal projections, like their amygdaloid targets, are important links in the sensory‐limbic pathways. These sources are: for vision, areas TE and ventral TG; for audition, anterior TA and dorsal TG; for taste, area IA; and for somesthesis, possibly areas IA or IB. The amygdalopetal sources thus occupy a limited territory that begins dorsally in the anterior insula and extends ventrally across the anterior temporal neocortex as far as the rhinal fissure. 3. Within the visual system, progressively heavier and more widespread efferents arise from successively later stages of the amygdalopetal sources. The posterior half of TE sends a moderate projection to the dorsal part of the lateral nucleus, the anterior half of TE sends a heavy projection to the dorsal parts of both the lateral and basal nuclei, and the ventral part of TG sends a heavy projection to the dorsal and medial parts of the lateral and basal nuclei and to the dorsal part of the basal accessory nucleus. This pattern of progressive intensification and spread of the amygdalopetal projections applies also to the auditory system and probably to the other cortical sensory systems as well. The pattern suggests that a progressively greater influence on amygdaloid activity is exerted by successively more highly processed sensory information. 4. The efferents to the amygdaloid complex from the different sensory systems terminate in a dovetailed pattern. The major amygdaloid targets are: for vision, the anterodorsal parts of the lateral, basal, and basal accessory nuclei; for audition, the posterior parts of the lateral and basal accessory nuclei; for taste, the medial parts of the lateral and basal nuclei; and for olfaction, the cortical and medial nuclei. This pattern implies that each part of the amygdala is under the major influence of a particular sensory system. 5. The same cortical areas that give rise to separate sensory channels to the amygdala send efferents that converge upon the perirhinal and prorhinal cortices, areas known to be a major source of input to the hippocampus. Consequently, both the amygdala and hippocampus can be activated by the same highly processed sensory information, a conclusion that may help to account for a recent finding that these two structures can substitute for each other in a mechanism for recognition memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., & Acuna, C. (1975) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.871 · Cited by 2,061
Jones, E. G., Burton, H., Saper, C. B., & Swanson, L. W. (1976) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901670402 · Cited by 420
Cited by
LeDoux, J. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 · Cited by 8,444
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(83)90190-x · Cited by 2,947
Self-citationDifferential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning.
Phillips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E. (1992) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.106.2.274 · Cited by 3,292
The Emotional Brain, Fear, and the Amygdala
LeDoux, J. (2003) · Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1023/a:1025048802629 · Cited by 1,818
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, B. H., Mishkin, M., & Knapp, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-06-15
- Volume
- 191
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 515-543
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2043372243
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organization of the amygdalopetal projections from modality‐specific cortical association areas in the monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901910402
- The paper
- Turner, B. H., Mishkin, M., & Knapp, M. (1980). Organization of the amygdalopetal projections from modality‐specific cortical association areas in the monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901910402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.