The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organization of afferent input to subdivisions of area 8 in the rhesus monkey
Abstract
The sources of ipsilateral afferents to subdivisions of one frontal eye field (Walker, '40a area 8 ) were studied with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in macaque monkeys. There were major differences in the distribution of cells pro‐ jecting to the caudal and rostral parts of area 8. The majority (53%) of labeled cortical cells projecting to caudal regions were in visual association areas, and an additional 23% were in the ventral bank of the intraparietal sulcus, where neurons may have predominantly visual and visuomotor properties. In contrast, rostral area 8 had a much lower percentage of its cortical input originating in visual association areas (5%) or in the ventral bank ofthe intraparietal sulcus (8%). After HRP injection in this rostral part, 21% of labeled cells were in auditory association areas and 13% in paralimbic regions, whereas labeling in these two types of cortex was negligible after HRP administration to caudal parts of area 8. The percentage of cells in other association regions (portions of the banks of the superior temporal sulcus, dorsolateral parietal, medial parietal, and prefrontal cortices) was higher in the rostral (53%) than in the caudal case (21%). The results suggest that caudal area 8 may be involved in head and eye movements in response to visual stimuli, while its anterior subdivisions may be involved in directing the head and eyes in response to auditory stimuli. Furthermore, limbic input may also be relevant to the neural processing occurring in rostral frontal eye fields, perhaps by directing attention toward motivationally relevant stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., & Acuna, C. (1975) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.871 · Cited by 2,061
The posterior thalamic region and its cortical projection in new world and old world monkeys
Burton, H., & Jones, E. G. (1976) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901680204 · Cited by 555
Cited by
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory
Mesulam, M. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410280502 · Cited by 2,684
Self-citationA cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect
Mesulam, M. ‐. (1981) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410100402 · Cited by 2,498
Self-citationKane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196323 · Cited by 2,229
(1991) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62678-3 · Cited by 1,961
Metadata
- Authors
- Barbas, H., & Mesulam, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-08-10
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-431
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2034897939
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organization of afferent input to subdivisions of area 8 in the rhesus monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902000309
- The paper
- Barbas, H., & Mesulam, M. (1981). Organization of afferent input to subdivisions of area 8 in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902000309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.