Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The process of reinnervation in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: A quantitative electron microscopic analysis of terminal proliferation and reactive synaptogenesis

Steward, Oswald, Vinsant, Sharon L.·1983·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The present study defined the time course of terminal proliferation (the growth of presynaptic processes) and reactive Synaptogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat. Quantitative electron microscopic analyses were carried out in the dentate gyrus 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 days and 7 months after destruction of the ipsilateral entorhinal cortex and in the contralateral (control) dentate gyrus. At each survival interval, counts were made from photographic montages of (1) terminals (presynaptic processes with or without contacts with postsynaptic elements), (2) intact synapses, (3) degenerating synapses, (4) degeneration (degenerating presynaptic processes), and (5) multiple synapses (terminals making more than one synaptic contact). Terminal density was initially reduced to about 13% of control in the middle molecular layer at 2 and 4 days postlesion, and to about 26% of control in the outer. The density of terminals began to increase between 4 and 6 days postlesion, reaching a plateau by day 12. Synapse density was reduced to about 8% and 12% of control in the middle and outer molecular layer respectively. Synapse density increased about 5‐fold between 8 and 12 days postlesion, but continued to increase in the period between 14 days and 7 months postlesion. At 2 days postlesion, the number of intact terminals that are lost corresponds to the number of degenerating presynaptic processes. This correspondence is not present at 4 days postlesion, however, suggesting a rapid removal of degenerating terminals. In contrast, even at 2 days post‐lesion, the number of intact synapses that are lost does not correspond to the number of degenerating synapses. Between 2 and 10 days postlesion, the number of postsynaptic specializations is about 60% of control, but recovers slightly by 12‐14 days postlesion. Qualitative and quantitative evidence suggested a collapse of spines into configurations that resembled shaft synapses. There appeared to be a deformation of degenerating presynaptic processes resulting in the appearance of multiple synapse configurations prior to reinnervation. The combined results suggest that terminal proliferation precedes reactive Synaptogenesis in the dentate gyrus by 2‐4 days, that terminal proliferation is essentially complete by 12 days while reactive Synaptogenesis continues, and that multiple synapses arise at least in part as a result of a deformation of degenerating presynaptic processes rather than as a consequence of the induction of additional contacts on existing presynaptic terminals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902140403

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Steward, O., & Vinsant, S. L.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-03-10
Volume
214
Issue
4
Pages
370-386
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2023634037
Cited by
257
References
0
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The process of reinnervation in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: A quantitative electron microscopic analysis of terminal proliferation and reactive synaptogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902140403
The paper
Steward, O., & Vinsant, S. L. (1983). The process of reinnervation in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: A quantitative electron microscopic analysis of terminal proliferation and reactive synaptogenesis. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902140403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.