Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cortical and thalamic afferent connections of the insular and adjacent cortex of the rat

Guldin, W. O., Markowitsch, H. J.·1983·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Thalamic and cortical afferents to the insular and perirhinal cortex of the rat were investigated, Unilateral injections of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) were made iontophoretically along the rhinal sulcus. HRP injections covered or invaded areas along the rhinal fissure from about the level of the middle cerebral artery to the posterior end of the fissure. The most anterior injection labeled a few cells in the mediodorsal nucleus. More posterior injections labeled neurons in the basal portion of the nucleus ventralis medialis, thus suggesting that this cortical region constitutes the rat's gustatory (insular) cortex. We consider the cortex situated posterior to the gustatory cortex in and above the rhinal sulcus as the core region of the rat's (associative) insular cortex, as this cortex receives afferents from the regions of and between the nuclei suprageniculatus and geniculatus medialis, pars magnocellularis. It includes parts of the cortex termed perirhinal in other studies. The cortex dorsal and posterior to the insular cortex we consider auditory cortex, as it receives afferents from the principal part of the medial geniculate nucleus, and the cortex ventral to the insular cortex (below the fundus of the rhinal sulcus) we consider to constitute the pre‐piriform cortex, which is athalamic. The posterior part of the perirhinal cortex (area 35) receives afferents from nonspecific thalamic nuclei (midline nuclei). Cortical afferents to the injection loci arise from a number of regions, above all from regions of the medial and sulcal prefrontal cortex. Those injections confined to the projection cortex of the suprageniculate‐magno‐cellular medial geniculate nuclear complex also led to labeling in contra‐lateral prefrontal regions, particularly in area 25 (infralimbic region). A comparison of our results with those on the insular cortex of cats and monkeys suggests that on the basis of thalamocortical connections, topographical relations, and involvements of neurons in information processing and overt behavior, the insular cortex has to be regarded as a heterogeneous region which may be separated into prefrontal insular, gustatory (somato‐sensory) insular, and associative insular portions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902150203

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Guldin, W. O., & Markowitsch, H. J.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-04
Volume
215
Issue
2
Pages
135-153
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2036883654
Cited by
181
References
3
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortical and thalamic afferent connections of the insular and adjacent cortex of the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902150203
The paper
Guldin, W. O., & Markowitsch, H. J. (1983). Cortical and thalamic afferent connections of the insular and adjacent cortex of the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902150203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.