The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A quantitative analysis of changes in the olfactory epithelium following bulbectomy in hamster
Abstract
Continuous replacement of sensory neurons is a normal process in the olfactory system of adult vertebrates. The capacity for replacement following experimentally induced degeneration of sensory neurons makes this system ideal for the study of the dynamics of neural populations. A quantitative analysis was made to determine the time course and degree of cell replace‐ment in the olfactory epithelium following unilateral bulbectomy in adult hamsters. Histological measurements of number of cells and epithelial thickness were made for up to 194 days postoperatively. Results for each experimental animal were expressed as a percentage of the contralateral control side. There was an immediate degeneration of cells, the number decreasing to 39% by day 4. During days 4–15 new growth resulted in an increase in cell number, which was maintained at a level of 60–70% through day 194. Epithelial thickness decreased to 60–70% during the degeneration period, but there was no recovery during subsequent days 4–194. Analysis of epithelial cells by cell type (supporting, receptor, and basal cells) showed that changes in cell numbers were limited to the neural cell populations (receptor and basal). This study confirms that olfactory sensory neurons are capable of replacement following degeneration in spite of the absence of normal target tissue. However, the observed recovery does not reach control levels and the functional capacity of replacement neurons requires further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neural regeneration and the peripheral olfactory system
Schwob, J. E. (2002) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.10047 · Cited by 511
Olfactory ensheathing glia: properties and function
Ramón-Cueto, A., & Avila, J. (1998) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(97)00463-2 · Cited by 377
Calof, A. L., & Chikaraishi, D. M. (1989) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(89)90120-7 · Cited by 362
Verhaagen, J., Oestreicher, A., Gispen, W., & Margolis, F. (1989) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.09-02-00683.1989 · Cited by 309
An autoradiographic study of the mouse olfactory epithelium: Evidence for long‐lived receptors
Hinds, J. W., Hinds, P. L., & McNelly, N. A. (1984) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1092100213 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Costanzo, R. M., & Graziadei, P. P. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-04-20
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 370-381
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2070897110
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantitative analysis of changes in the olfactory epithelium following bulbectomy in hamster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902150403
- The paper
- Costanzo, R. M., & Graziadei, P. P. C. (1983). A quantitative analysis of changes in the olfactory epithelium following bulbectomy in hamster. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902150403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.