The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Motoneuron death after sciatic nerve section in newborn rats
Abstract
When the sciatic nerve was cut in newborn rats almost all of the motoneurons were subsequently lost. The adult sciatic nerve contained 7,640 myelinated fibers of which 1,650 were motor axons. The ventral roots of the sciatic nerve (L4‐L6) contained in all 4,080 myelinated fibres; only 2,380 were present 5–30 weeks after the sciatic nerve had been cut at birth. The deficit of 1,700 fibres corresponded to the number of motor axons in the sciatic nerve. The motoneuron pools were depleted and practically no labelled or unlabelled perikarya were after found after HRP had been applied to the nerve proximal to the former lesion. The deficit of ventral root fibres was 1,030 when the nerve had been cut at age 1 week; nerve section 4 weeks after birth was not followed by retrograde loss of motor axons. Nerve crush at birth caused a deficit of 1,230 ventral root fibres. The incomplete loss of motor axons after crushing was due to the fact that not all axons had been severed. The continuity of the nerves cut at birth was always restored and myelinated axons which probably were dorsal root ganglion afferents grew into the atrophic muscles. Roughly two‐thirds of the myelinated sensory fibres degenerated after axotomy at birth. The denervated muscle fibres were not reinnervated but vanished eventually and were replaced by fat cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration
Fu, S. Y., & Gordon, T. (1997) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02740621 · Cited by 1,202
Influence of aging on peripheral nerve function and regeneration
Verdu, E., Ceballos, D., Vilches, J. J., & Navarro, X. (2000) · Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System · doi:10.1046/j.1529-8027.2000.00026.x · Cited by 855
The changing scene of neurotrophic factors
Thoenen, H. (1991) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(91)90097-e · Cited by 820
Sendtner, M., Holtmann, B., Kolbeck, R., Thoenen, H., & Barde, Y.-A. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/360757a0 · Cited by 707
Evidence that brain-derived neurotrophic factor is a trophic factor for motor neurons in vivo
Koliatsos, V. E., Clatterbuck, R. E., Winslow, J. W., Cayouette, M. H., & Prices, D. L. (1993) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(93)90326-m · Cited by 539
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmalbruch, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-04
- Volume
- 224
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 252-258
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2168731670
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motoneuron death after sciatic nerve section in newborn rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902240206
- The paper
- Schmalbruch, H. (1984). Motoneuron death after sciatic nerve section in newborn rats. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902240206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.