The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modification of fibrin matrix formation in situ enhances nerve regeneration in silicone chambers
Abstract
The spatial‐temporal progress of nerve regeneration was examined in silicone chambers of three different volume capacities: 11, 25, and 75 μl. In all chambers, the stumps of a transected rat sciatic nerve were sutured into the ends of the chamber leaving a 10 mm gap between the stumps. Chambers were implanted empty (E chambers) or prefilled with saline (PF chambers). A coaxial and continuous fibrin matrix had formed in all chambers by 1 week. In E chambers, the matrices had a proximal‐distal taper that was more pronounced in E25 and E75 chambers due to significantly larger matrix diameters in the proximal region. At 3 weeks, vascular and Schwann cell migration and axonal regeneration were less advanced in the E25 and E75 than in the control E11 chambers. The retardation correlated with the presence of an avascular organization of circumferential cells. Saline prefill‐ing affected the caliber and density of fibrin fibers in the 1 week matrices of PF25 and PF75 chambers. The matrices did not have a prominent taper and diameters were progressively larger with increasing chamber volume. Saline prefilling did not affect regeneration progress in 3 week PF11 chambers but did enhance regeneration in the PF25 chambers; a 1.5‐fold larger diameter nerve formed at 3 weeks that contained 2,6‐fold more axons. Progress in the PF75 chamber was retarded. We conclude that the volume, timing, and nature of the fluid filling a silicone chamber have significant influence on the formation of fibrin matrices. Alterations in matrix formation correlate with substantial changes in the subsequent progress of intrachamber regeneration events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The cellular and molecular basis of peripheral nerve regeneration
Fu, S. Y., & Gordon, T. (1997) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/bf02740621 · Cited by 1,202
Peripheral Nerve Injury and Repair
Lee, S. K., & Wolfe, S. W. (2000) · Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · doi:10.5435/00124635-200007000-00005 · Cited by 685
Lundborg, G. (2000) · The Journal of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1053/jhsu.2000.4165 · Cited by 656
Development of fibrin derivatives for controlled release of heparin-binding growth factors
Sakiyama-Elbert, S. E., & Hubbell, J. A. (2000) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00221-7 · Cited by 565
Guenard, V, Kleitman, N., Morrissey, T., Bunge, R., & Aebischer, P. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-09-03310.1992 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, L. R., & Varon, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-01-08
- Volume
- 231
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-220
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2083910200
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modification of fibrin matrix formation in situ enhances nerve regeneration in silicone chambers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902310208
- The paper
- Williams, L. R., & Varon, S. (1985). Modification of fibrin matrix formation in situ enhances nerve regeneration in silicone chambers. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902310208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.