The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Golgi study of the human neostriatum: Neurons and afferent fibers
Abstract
The neostriatum of 20 adult humans was examined in Golgi‐Kopsch and rapid Golgi preparations. At least five types of neurons and four types of afferent fibers are described. Neurons of medium size with spine‐rich dendrites (spiny type I) are the most frequent type. These cells exhibit a greater morphological diversity than those previously studied in the monkey. Also, quantitative data show that, compared to the monkey, spiny type I neurons in man have a greater somal size and dendritic field radius. Although the types of spines are similar, the mean density and radial distribution of spines along dendrites differ in the two species. Morphologic features of the axon, which is usually long with extensive collateral branches, suggest that more than one process from the axon may be efferent. Medium to large neurons with sparsely spined dendrites (spiny‐type II) differ from type I neurons in having a poorer branching and greater radial spread of their dendrites and a lower density of spines. They also differ from spiny type I neurons in their distribution and relative proportion of various spine types. The axon of the spiny type II neuron is long and has collaterals which are poorly arborized in comparison to those of spiny type I cells. Aspiny neurons are of medium (aspiny type I) and large (aspiny type II) size. They have varicose, curved dendrites and a short axon which arborizes mostly within the dendritic field. A group of smaller neurons with more variable dendritic morphology is also seen. Observations suggest that in the human brain the proportion of medium‐sized aspiny neurons and small neurons may be greater than in other species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Functional diversity and specificity of neostriatal interneurons
Tepper, J. M., & Bolam, J. P. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.003 · Cited by 526
Physiology and pharmacology of striatal neurons
Kreitzer, A. C. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135422 · Cited by 530
GABAergic microcircuits in the neostriatum
Tepper, J. M., Koós, T., & Wilson, C. J. (2004) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.007 · Cited by 434
Parvalbumin-immunoreactive neurons in the rat neostriatum: a light and electron microscopic study
Kita, H., Kosaka, T., & Heizmann, C. W. (1990) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(90)90002-s · Cited by 431
Neural representations and mechanisms for the performance of simple speech sequences
Bohland, J. W., Bullock, D., & Guenther, F. H. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21306 · Cited by 393
“Also found in the striatum, but less prevalent (only 2–3% of striatal cells in rats, but perhaps as many as 23% in humans; Graveland, 1985), are heterogeneous interneurons, many of which exhibit resting firing rates and receive cortical, thalamic, and dopaminergic input (Tepper, Koos, & Wilson,…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Graveland, G. A., Williams, R. S., & Difiglia, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-04-15
- Volume
- 234
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-333
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2051401942
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Golgi study of the human neostriatum: Neurons and afferent fibers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902340304
- The paper
- Graveland, G. A., Williams, R. S., & Difiglia, M. (1985). A Golgi study of the human neostriatum: Neurons and afferent fibers. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902340304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.