Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Membrane area and dendritic structure in type‐identified triceps surae alpha motoneurons

Cullheim, S., Fleshman, J. W., Glenn, L. L., Burke, R. E.·1987·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The size and branching structure of the dendritic tree were studied in nine type‐identified triceps surae α‐motoneurons that were labeled intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase and reconstructed from serial sections in the light microscope. The average total membrane area (A N) for motoneurons of type S (slow‐twitch) motor units was about 22% smaller than A N for cells of type F units (including both FF and FR motor unit types in this category) (480.1 × 10 3 μml;m 2 vs. 617.7 ×10 3 μm 2, respectively). Systematic correlations were found between stem dendrite diameter and three measures of dendritic size: dendrite membrane area, combined dendritic length, and number of terminations. All of these correlations were significantly different for the dendrites of F and S montoneurons. Power‐function relations between stem diameter and dendritic membrane area were used to estimate A N for a sample of 79 type‐identified motoneurons. Mean estimated A N values were significantly different for the F and S motoneuron groups, despite a large overlap in A N values between these groups. The branching structure of dendrites of F and S motoneurons also showed clear differences. Type S motoneuron dendrites showed less‐profuse branching and a more‐even radial distribution of branch points than found in type F cells. Examination of two forms of the “3/2 power rule” for the relation between the diameters of parent and daughter dendritic branches at branch points showed that the dendrites of type S motoneurons conform less well with the anatomical constraints necessary to represent binary branching trees as equivalent cylinders than do dendrites of type F cells. There was no systematic difference between F and S motoneuron dendrites in the degree of asymmetry of first‐order daughter trees. The results overall indicate that the dendrites of F and S motoneuron groups are structurally different, giving rise to a systematic difference in A N between these groups. Such structural differences suggest that the F and S groups of α‐motoneurons can be viewed as intrinsically distinct cell types and not just large vs. small variants of the same cell species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902550106

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Cullheim, S., Fleshman, J. W., Glenn, L. L., & Burke, R. E.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-01
Volume
255
Issue
1
Pages
68-81
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2042706351
Cited by
289
References
25
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membrane area and dendritic structure in type‐identified triceps surae alpha motoneurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902550106
The paper
Cullheim, S., Fleshman, J. W., Glenn, L. L., & Burke, R. E. (1987). Membrane area and dendritic structure in type‐identified triceps surae alpha motoneurons. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902550106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.