Cited by 231Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeurological disorders and treatments

Morphological differences between projection neurons of the core and shell in the nucleus accumbens of the rat

Meredith, G.E., Agolia, R., Arts, M.P.M., Groenewegen, H.J., Zahm, D.S.·1992·Neuroscience

Abstract

The somatodendritic morphology of projection neurons in the shell and core of the rat nucleus accumbens was studied. These cells were retrogradely labelled with Fast Blue from the ventral mesencephalon (substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area) and subsequently injected intracellularly with Lucifer Yellow and processed immunocytochemically. Digitized reconstructions revealed that the cell bodies of neurons located throughout the nucleus are small-to-medium in size. Neurons in the shell have significantly fewer dendritic arbours with fewer branch segments, fewer terminal segments, and lower spine densities than those in the core. Values for the same parameters are significantly greater for cells in lateral than in medial parts of the shell but the same for neurons located within and without enkephalin enriched parts of the core, with an exception of spine density being significantly greater in the enkephalin-rich compartment. Calculations based on these data reveal that neurons in the core have as much as 50% more surface area than those in the shell, which suggests that core neurons have a greater potential for collecting synaptic information than have shell cells. Furthermore, the differential distribution and action of various neurochemicals such as dopamine in the shell and core, supports the idea that different morphologies reflect the presence of distinct neuronal circuits in these two territories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90389-j

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meredith, G. E., Agolia, R., Arts, M. P. M., Groenewegen, H. J., & Zahm, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Meredith, G.E.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-09
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
149-162
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083738090
Cited by
231
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS23805, R01NS023805)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
nucleus accumbens, projection neurons, dendritic morphology, dendritic spines, enkephalin, substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, dopamine, neural circuits, synaptic input
MeSH terms
Amidines, Animals, Axonal Transport, Corpus Striatum, Dendrites, Enkephalin, Leucine, Female, Fluorescent Dyes, Golgi Apparatus, Horseradish Peroxidase, Isoquinolines, Mesencephalon, Neurons, Nucleus Accumbens, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review