The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GABA immunoreactive neurons in rat visual cortex
Abstract
An antiserum to γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) was used in a light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical study to determine the morphology and distribution of GABA‐containing neurons in the rat visual cortex and to ascertain whether all classes of nonpyramidal neurons in this cortex are GABAergic. The visual cortex used for light microscopy was prepared in such a way that the antibody penetrated completely through tissue sections, and in these sections large numbers of GABA immunoreactive neurons were apparent. The labeled neurons could be identified as being either multipolar, bitufted, bipolar, or horizontal neurons. In layers II through Via, GABA immunostained cells were distributed uniformly and accounted for approximately 15% of all neurons, but in layer I all neurons appeared to be immunostained. Electron microscopy of GABA immunostained visual cortex prepared to ensure good fine structural preservation confirmed the presence in layers II through Via of numerous immunoreactive bipolar neurons, both small and large varieties, as well as multipolar and bitufted neurons. Additionally, electron microscopy reveals that astrocytes are frequently GABA immunoreactive. From a correlated light and electron microscopic evaluation of neurons in GABA immunostained visual cortex, it was possible to confirm which kinds of neurons are GABAergic and what proportion of the neuronal population they represent. Thus, from an analysis of some 950 neurons, it was found that pyramidal neurons were never immunoreactive and that except for 20% of the bipolar cell population, all examples of other types of nonpyramidal neurons encountered in this material were GABA immunoreactive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A specific ‘axo-axonal’ interneuron in the visual cortex of the rat
Somogyi, P. (1977) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(77)90808-3 · Cited by 530
Tsumoto, T., Eckart, W., & Creutzfeldt, O. D. (1979) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235678 · Cited by 302
Fairén, A., Cobas, A., & Fonseca, M. (1986) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902510105 · Cited by 158
Cited by
How Inhibition Shapes Cortical Activity
Isaacson, J. S., & Scanziani, M. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.027 · Cited by 1,678
The cost of cortical computation.
Lennie, P. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00135-0 · Cited by 1,134
Distinct cortical migrations from the medial and lateral ganglionic eminences
Anderson, S. A., Marín, O., Horn, C., Jennings, K., & Rubenstein, J. L. R. (2001) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.128.3.353 · Cited by 657
The Evolution of the Brain, the Human Nature of Cortical Circuits, and Intellectual Creativity
DeFelipe, J. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2011.00029 · Cited by 527
Selective reconfiguration of layer 4 visual cortical circuitry by visual deprivation
Maffei, A., Nelson, S. B., & Turrigiano, G. G. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1351 · Cited by 415
Metadata
- Authors
- Meinecke, D. L., & Peters, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-07-15
- Volume
- 261
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 388-404
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1976199729
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GABA immunoreactive neurons in rat visual cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902610305
- The paper
- Meinecke, D. L., & Peters, A. (1987). GABA immunoreactive neurons in rat visual cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902610305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.