Cited by 531Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

A specific ‘axo-axonal’ interneuron in the visual cortex of the rat

Somogyi, P.·1977·Brain Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90808-3

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Somogyi, P.
Affiliations
Semmelweis University (HU)
Corresponding author
Somogyi, P.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-11
Volume
136
Issue
2
Pages
345-350
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077544618
Cited by
530
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
chandelier cells, GABAergic interneurons, visual cortex, pyramidal neurons, inhibitory synapse formation, synaptic plasticity, brain development, inhibitory circuits, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Interneurons, Pyramidal Tracts, Synapses, Visual Cortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review