Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative distribution of dopamine D‐1 and D‐2 receptors in the basal ganglia of turtles, pigeons, rats, cats, and monkeys

Richfield, Eric K., Young, Anne B., Penney, John B.·1987·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The distribution and density of dopamine D‐1 and D‐2 receptors were studied in the basal ganglia of adult turtles, pigeons, rats, cats, and monkeys. Dopamine receptors were measured in vitro by quantitative autoradiography in alternate sections processed for D‐1 and D‐2 receptor subtypes and compared to adjacent sections stained for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity. [3 H]‐SCH 23390 and [3 H]‐spiroperidol were used to label the D‐1 and D‐2 dopamine receptor subtypes, respectively. The anatomic distribution of both D‐1 and D‐2 receptors in the basal ganglia was remarkably similar across all species examined. Whereas the absolute number of D‐1 and D‐2 receptors in the basal ganglia varied between species, the percentage of D‐1 and D‐2 receptors in a region was quite similar among species. The pattern of binding to the D‐1 and D‐2 receptor varied among the different species. The adult turtles, pigeons, and rats demonstrated non‐patchy D‐1 and D‐2 receptor binding in the striatum and pallidum. The adult cat and monkey caudate nucleus and putamen demonstrated mildly heterogeneous receptor binding in a pattern that differed from that seen with AChE staining, but did occasionally demonstrate similar patterns of the D‐1 and D‐2 receptor subtypes, The immature cat striatum was characterized by heterogeneous D‐1 receptor binding that corresponded to heterogeneous AChE rich patches, whereas D‐2 receptor binding was homogeneous. Heterogeneous binding was seen in other basal ganglia structures including the nucleus accumbens, olfactory tubercle, and substantia nigra pars compacta and reticulata. Complementary D‐1 and D‐2 receptor binding patterns were seen in the pallidum and substantia nigra of the mammals. The results of this study indicate that both D‐1 and D‐2 dopamine receptors are present in the basal ganglia of five different vertebrates. A common feature of dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia is their heterogeneity in distribution and density. The heterogeneity of dopamine receptors has similarities to and differences from the distribution of presynaptic dopamine and other neurotransmitter markers of the basal ganglia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902620308

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Richfield, E. K., Young, A. B., & Penney, J. B.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-08-15
Volume
262
Issue
3
Pages
446-463
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2150807108
Cited by
263
References
1
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative distribution of dopamine D‐1 and D‐2 receptors in the basal ganglia of turtles, pigeons, rats, cats, and monkeys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902620308
The paper
Richfield, E. K., Young, A. B., & Penney, J. B. (1987). Comparative distribution of dopamine D‐1 and D‐2 receptors in the basal ganglia of turtles, pigeons, rats, cats, and monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902620308

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.