Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for coexistence of GABA and dopamine in neurons of the rat olfactory bulb

Gall, Christine M., Hendry, Stewart H. C., Seroogy, Kim B., Jones, Edward G., Haycock, John W.·1987·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Immunoreactivities for γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) and the dopaminesynthesizing enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) wore localized ultrastructurally and colocalized at the light microscopic level in neurons of the rat main olfactory bulb. By means of a simultaneous indirect immunofluorescence technique, GABA and TH immunoreactivities were found to coexist in a large number of neurons in the glomerular and external plexiform layers. Virtually all the TH‐immunoreactive periglomerular neurons also contained GABA immunoreactivity (GABA‐I) while there was an additional number of GABA‐immunoreactive periglomerular cells (27%) which did not contain TH immunoreactivity (TH‐I). In contrast, the numerous tufted‐type neurons in the glomerular and superficial external plexiform layers which contained TH‐I did not contain GABA‐I. In the external plexiform layer (EPL), 41% of the immunoreactive neurons contained GABA‐I alone, 24% contained TH‐I alone, and 35% contained both. EPL neurons containing GABA‐I only or both GABA‐I and TH‐I never exhibited tufted cell morphological characteristics and were generally of the short‐axon type. Electron microscopic examination of GABA‐I and TH‐I elements in the glomerular layer detected morphologically similar periglomerular perikarya and intraglomerular processes immunoreactive for each substance and other neurons and processes of the same type containing neither GABA‐I or TH‐I. These data indicate that the classical neurotransmitters GABA and dopamine coexist in large numbers of neurons in the rat main olfactory bulb including characteristic periglomerular cells and certain other local‐circuit neuronal types.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902660302

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Gall, C. M., Hendry, S. H. C., Seroogy, K. B., Jones, E. G., & Haycock, J. W.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-12-15
Volume
266
Issue
3
Pages
307-318
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2147221228
Cited by
201
References
1
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for coexistence of GABA and dopamine in neurons of the rat olfactory bulb. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902660302
The paper
Gall, C. M., Hendry, S. H. C., Seroogy, K. B., Jones, E. G., & Haycock, J. W. (1987). Evidence for coexistence of GABA and dopamine in neurons of the rat olfactory bulb. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902660302

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.