Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Corticothalamic connections of paralimbic regions in the rhesus monkey

Yeterian, Edward H., Pandya, Deepak N.·1988·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

This study addressed the issue of whether paralimbic regions of the cerebral cortex share common thalamic projections. The corticothalamic connections of the paralimbic regions of the orbital frontal, medial prefrontal, cingulate, parahippocampal, and temporal polar cortices were studied with the autoradiographic method in the rhesus monkey. The results revealed that the orbital frontal, medial prefrontal, and temporal polar proisocortices have substantial projections to both the dorsomedial and medial pulvinar nuclei, whereas the anterior cingulate proisocortex (area 24) projects exclusively to the dorsomedial nucleus. These proisocortical areas also have thalamic connections with the intralaminar and midline nuclei. The cortical areas between the proisocortical regions on the one hand and the isocortical areas on the other, that is, the posterior cingulate region (area 23) and the posterior parahippocampal gyrus (areas TF and TH), project predominantly to the dorsal portion of the medial pulvinar nucleus, the anterior nuclear group (AV, AM), and the lateral dorsal (LD) nucleus. Additionally, the posterior cingulate and medial parahippocampal gyri (area TH) have projections to the lateral posterior (LP) nucleus. Thus, it appears that the proisocortical areas, which are characterized by a predominance of infragranular layers and an absence of layer IV, have common thalamic relationships. Likewise, the intermediate paralimbic areas between the proisocortex and isocortical regions, which also have a predominance of infragranular layers but in addition have evidence of a fourth layer, project to the medial pulvinar and to the so‐called limbic nuclei, AV, AM, LD, as well as a modality‐specific nucleus, LP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902690111

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Yeterian, E. H., & Pandya, D. N.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-03
Volume
269
Issue
1
Pages
130-146
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2059012219
Cited by
180
References
6
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corticothalamic connections of paralimbic regions in the rhesus monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902690111
The paper
Yeterian, E. H., & Pandya, D. N. (1988). Corticothalamic connections of paralimbic regions in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902690111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.